From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Fri Sep 30 11:26:16 2005
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 30 Sep 2005 11:26:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.52)
	id 1ELPaB-0000RH-4f
	for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 11:26:07 -0700
Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.192])
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52)
	id 1ELPa9-0000R4-NA
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 11:26:06 -0700
Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i23so655wra
        for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 11:26:04 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type;
        b=nClQHB4ObqPX+CEPahOgW2vtlB7+BLnhPSs9a3KRSB/MW5Us6z+0fJRJKJW0+hFbQGVkGBg4c8hEY5f7sQXS4c1Yc8CaetoBDS7440yTmsMgJ1empAhDbLeNJFJ9CzMyJgy2arzG9U43Zu91E9SCjmQDAkwH6tdJSYGeFZTOC8o=
Received: by 10.54.122.14 with SMTP id u14mr943942wrc;
        Fri, 30 Sep 2005 11:26:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.54.142.3 with HTTP; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 11:26:04 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <e6663d200509301126u7975a3cdr1287dcf906fd3a05@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 14:26:04 -0400
From: Matt Arnold <matt.mattarn@gmail.com>
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] other parsable languages
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_4358_30259312.1128104764414"
X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-)
X-archive-position: 10684
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: matt.mattarn@gmail.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-list

------=_Part_4358_30259312.1128104764414
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

I know that Lojban is hailed as "parsable" by a computer, but does this mea=
n
that it is merely parsed more easily? Or that no other language has a
complete YACC grammar? Can someone offer a little more detail to someone wh=
o
is not a specialist?
-Matt

------=_Part_4358_30259312.1128104764414
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

I know that Lojban is hailed as &quot;parsable&quot; by a computer, but doe=
s this
mean that it is merely parsed more easily? Or that no other language
has a complete YACC grammar? Can someone offer a little more detail to
someone who is not a specialist?<br>
-Matt<br>

------=_Part_4358_30259312.1128104764414--


To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org
with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if
you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.