From lojban-out@lojban.org Tue Sep 27 13:34:22 2005
Return-Path: <lojban-out@lojban.org>
X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (qmail 50853 invoked from network); 27 Sep 2005 20:34:20 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.167)
  by m8.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 27 Sep 2005 20:34:20 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.81.49.134)
  by mta6.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 27 Sep 2005 20:34:20 -0000
Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.52)
	id 1EKM9Y-0004un-V6
	for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Tue, 27 Sep 2005 13:34:17 -0700
Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.49.134])
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52)
	id 1EKM89-0004tJ-5v; Tue, 27 Sep 2005 13:32:51 -0700
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 27 Sep 2005 13:32:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.52)
	id 1EKM7S-0004t1-Sq
	for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Tue, 27 Sep 2005 13:32:07 -0700
Received: from zproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.162.203])
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52)
	id 1EKM7R-0004ss-Bl
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 27 Sep 2005 13:32:06 -0700
Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id k1so543598nzf
        for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Tue, 27 Sep 2005 13:32:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.54.52.70 with SMTP id z70mr3060113wrz;
        Tue, 27 Sep 2005 13:32:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.54.142.3 with HTTP; Tue, 27 Sep 2005 13:32:03 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <e6663d2005092713326cbf4e02@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 16:32:04 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_5833_1999420.1127853124016"
X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-)
X-archive-position: 10650
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: matt.mattarn@gmail.com
X-list: lojban-list
X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-)
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
X-Originating-IP: 64.81.49.134
X-eGroups-Msg-Info: 1:12:0:0
X-eGroups-From: Matt Arnold <matt.mattarn@gmail.com>
From: Matt Arnold <lojban-out@lojban.org>
Reply-To: matt.mattarn@gmail.com
Subject: [lojban] xorlo podcast
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790; y=Q1aoHMcufLomE6u_LqbEgcZqQeX0EbDriERIaCvLmEPgK-i1IA
X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out
X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 25035

           
------=_Part_5833_1999420.1127853124016 
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

I would like to run an audio article on the Lojban podcast about xorlo's us=
e
of {lo} and {le}, contrasting them with the old meanings, offering a rundow=
n
of the reasons, and confirming the current status of xorlo's voted-upon
legitimacy or lack thereof. The contrary accounts of this key language
feature is one of the most confusing discrepancies likely to plague
newcomers, and it would be good to have an expert clear it up once and for
all. I would write it, but I myself am vague on the subject. Any takers?
-epkat
           
------=_Part_5833_1999420.1127853124016 
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

I would like to run an audio article on the Lojban podcast about
xorlo's use of {lo} and {le}, contrasting them with the old meanings,
offering a rundown of the reasons, and confirming the current status of
xorlo's voted-upon legitimacy or lack thereof. The contrary accounts of
this key language feature is one of the most confusing discrepancies
likely to plague
newcomers, and it would be good to have an expert clear it up once and
for all. I would write it, but I myself am vague on the subject. Any
takers?<br>
-epkat<br>
           
------=_Part_5833_1999420.1127853124016--