From lojban-out@lojban.org Sat Oct 29 17:25:47 2005
Return-Path: <lojban-out@lojban.org>
X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (qmail 66498 invoked from network); 30 Oct 2005 00:25:46 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216)
  by m26.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 30 Oct 2005 00:25:46 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.81.49.134)
  by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 30 Oct 2005 00:25:46 -0000
Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.54)
	id 1EW10x-0002MV-Hp
	for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Sat, 29 Oct 2005 17:25:35 -0700
Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.49.134])
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54)
	id 1EW0zD-0002Kv-HI; Sat, 29 Oct 2005 17:23:49 -0700
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sat, 29 Oct 2005 17:23:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.54)
	id 1EW0yu-0002Kk-EY
	for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Sat, 29 Oct 2005 17:23:28 -0700
Received: from phma.hn.org ([216.189.113.165] helo=blackcat.ixazon.lan)
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54)
	id 1EW0yt-0002Kc-Cv
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sat, 29 Oct 2005 17:23:28 -0700
Received: by blackcat.ixazon.lan (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 6E972892; Sun, 30 Oct 2005 00:23:50 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2005 20:23:47 -0400
User-Agent: KMail/1.8
References: <12d58c160510280915x764d9b8du4ba3f9a68d9742e1@mail.gmail.com> <12d58c160510281413v2a158464maecf719283548606@mail.gmail.com> <925d17560510281429l33f2435er16a241f5a83f88d0@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <925d17560510281429l33f2435er16a241f5a83f88d0@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200510292023.47866.phma@phma.hn.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-)
X-archive-position: 10748
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: phma@phma.hn.org
X-list: lojban-list
X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--)
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
X-Originating-IP: 64.81.49.134
X-eGroups-Msg-Info: 1:12:0:0
X-eGroups-From: Pierre Abbat <phma@phma.hn.org>
From: Pierre Abbat <lojban-out@lojban.org>
Reply-To: phma@phma.hn.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: citri lo glibau
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790; y=O6zMbDCQVqDybL4WqfynCbc3NN5NsTyPXq1zrngyuKUTnXdj_w
X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out
X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 25137

On Friday 28 October 2005 17:29, Jorge Llambías wrote:
> Yes. The comma is already optional though. No two words can differ
> by a comma. The comma can at most indicate a preferred
> pronounciation, but a word with or without the comma is
> the same word. At least that's the official rule. This causes
> some problems though: Is {stra,i} a valid fu'ivla, for instance?

I say {stra,i} is not a valid fu'ivla, but {stra,e} is, because {stra,i} is 
the same as {strai} which is one syllable, but {strae} has to be pronounced 
with at least two syllables.

I think that strings of three vowels, two adjacent of which are {ii} or {uu}, 
should be disallowed in brivla, but now that I've seen {BEouulf}, I think 
this should not apply to cmene.

phma


To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org
with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if
you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.