From lojban-out@lojban.org Wed Oct 05 05:54:43 2005
Return-Path: <lojban-out@lojban.org>
X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (qmail 77883 invoked from network); 5 Oct 2005 12:54:43 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.166)
  by m27.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 5 Oct 2005 12:54:43 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.81.49.134)
  by mta5.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 5 Oct 2005 12:54:42 -0000
Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.52)
	id 1EN8k6-0004xT-CV
	for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Wed, 05 Oct 2005 05:51:30 -0700
Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.49.134])
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52)
	id 1EN8it-0004wC-U6; Wed, 05 Oct 2005 05:50:23 -0700
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 05 Oct 2005 05:50:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.52)
	id 1EN8ib-0004vg-Q3
	for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Wed, 05 Oct 2005 05:49:57 -0700
Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.193])
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52)
	id 1EN8iX-0004vW-NQ
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 05 Oct 2005 05:49:57 -0700
Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 71so72335wri
        for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Wed, 05 Oct 2005 05:49:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.54.69.10 with SMTP id r10mr365623wra;
        Wed, 05 Oct 2005 05:49:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.54.66.3 with HTTP; Wed, 5 Oct 2005 05:49:48 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <925d17560510050549w48b0bc4chdf8c8ca12d2590e9@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2005 09:49:48 -0300
In-Reply-To: <20051005060906.GX16570@chain.digitalkingdom.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <e6663d2005092812501c3fdc6e@mail.gmail.com>
	 <433DE0C1.1060301@gulik.co.nz>
	 <20051001054113.GQ1749@chain.digitalkingdom.org>
	 <1128492006.7682.8.camel@localhost>
	 <20051005060906.GX16570@chain.digitalkingdom.org>
X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--)
X-archive-position: 10718
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: jjllambias@gmail.com
X-list: lojban-list
X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--)
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
X-Originating-IP: 64.81.49.134
X-eGroups-Msg-Info: 1:12:0:0
X-eGroups-From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= <jjllambias@gmail.com>
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= <lojban-out@lojban.org>
Reply-To: jjllambias@gmail.com
Subject: [lojban] Re: adverbs to indicate whose standard is used
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790; y=EPh-rhuWa2FJcBCer1fqS6sRCSYx68x6tFjXI_DijLEURJ_kAg
X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out
X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 25104

On 10/5/05, Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 11:00:06PM -0700, Theodore Reed wrote:
> > Maybe I'm missing something, but why hasn't anyone suggested using
> > evidentials?
> >
> > lo ka'u xlali nixli
>
> Because you can only tag one "culture" with ka'u.

Maybe with subscripts:

  ka'u xi vei mo'e mi
  ka'u xi vei mo'e mi'o
  ka'u xi vei mo'e ma'a
  ka'u xi vei mo'e mi'a

Except that with the current grammar the subscript does not attach to the
indicator...

(Is the requirement of {vei} there a remnant of LALR(1) days?)

mu'o mi'e xorxes


To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org
with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if
you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.