From lojban-out@lojban.org Fri Dec 02 23:24:44 2005 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 40373 invoked from network); 3 Dec 2005 07:24:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.166) by m23.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 3 Dec 2005 07:24:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.81.49.134) by mta5.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 3 Dec 2005 07:24:44 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1EiRi9-0003q1-1c for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Fri, 02 Dec 2005 23:21:33 -0800 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.49.134]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1EiRhe-0003pH-QY; Fri, 02 Dec 2005 23:21:04 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 02 Dec 2005 23:20:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1EiRhO-0003p5-Lm for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Fri, 02 Dec 2005 23:20:46 -0800 Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1EiRhO-0003oy-DQ for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 02 Dec 2005 23:20:46 -0800 Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2005 23:20:46 -0800 Message-ID: <20051203072046.GP9262@chain.digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-archive-position: 10824 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-list: lojban-list X-Spam-Score: -3.5 (---) To: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-Originating-IP: 64.81.49.134 X-eGroups-Msg-Info: 1:12:0:0 X-eGroups-From: Robin Lee Powell From: Robin Lee Powell Reply-To: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Subject: [lojban] "explicit" and "imply" X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790; y=hT7vg-LW3xwzuhHw31C4RpqjHseTNBon_mXt3B028huifPQxBg X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 25218 The "point" thing reminds me: there seems to be no word(s) for "explicit" and "implication". ex·plic·it (ĭk-splĭs'ĭt) adj. Fully and clearly expressed; leaving nothing implied. Fully and clearly defined or formulated. In the passed I've referred to this problem as "there's no word for "specific""; there is steci, but it's really a very different meaning. I've been stumped on this one, quite literally, for years. Help? -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/ Reason #237 To Learn Lojban: "Homonyms: Their Grate!" Proud Supporter of the Singularity Institute - http://singinst.org/ To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.