From lojban-out@lojban.org Tue Dec 06 12:31:32 2005 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 40298 invoked from network); 6 Dec 2005 20:31:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.167) by m24.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 6 Dec 2005 20:31:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.81.49.134) by mta6.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 6 Dec 2005 20:31:31 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1EjjRj-0007gC-MR for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Tue, 06 Dec 2005 12:29:55 -0800 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.49.134]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1EjjQi-0007fD-Ct; Tue, 06 Dec 2005 12:28:54 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 06 Dec 2005 12:28:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1EjjQQ-0007f4-Em for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2005 12:28:34 -0800 Received: from nproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.182.200]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1EjjQO-0007ex-Cx for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2005 12:28:34 -0800 Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id a27so47614nfc for ; Tue, 06 Dec 2005 12:28:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.48.241.18 with SMTP id o18mr63750nfh; Tue, 06 Dec 2005 12:28:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.48.164.3 with HTTP; Tue, 6 Dec 2005 12:28:30 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <12d58c160512061228g6d30cea0qbb078e8e6ada9600@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 15:28:30 -0500 In-Reply-To: <55b258c20512061219me71adbcyc207b98951edf960@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_6525_29018613.1133900910364" References: <55b258c20512061132m4d5bd5eawaf73523316f6b6d8@mail.gmail.com> <20051206200305.39766.qmail@web81309.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <55b258c20512061219me71adbcyc207b98951edf960@mail.gmail.com> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-archive-position: 10840 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: adamgarrigus@gmail.com X-list: lojban-list X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) To: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-Originating-IP: 64.81.49.134 X-eGroups-Msg-Info: 1:12:0:0 X-eGroups-From: Adam COOPER From: Adam COOPER Reply-To: adamgarrigus@gmail.com Subject: [lojban] Re: logo X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790; y=4GY4cN78TJSW1xrZrMQk6b4tHdCPSCVcyTm_hCm5X-rh8QMCxg X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 25235 ------=_Part_6525_29018613.1133900910364 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On 12/6/05, Craig Daniel wrote: > > True, but it's hard to argue that Germanic languages had nearly as > much influence on Spanish as, say, Arabic. Given that the Vandals & esp. the Visigoths came into Spain in some numbers= , before the Spanish languages distinguished themselves from Latin, I'm not sure it's that hard to argue. mu'o mi'e komfo,amonan ------=_Part_6525_29018613.1133900910364 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On 12/6/05, Craig Daniel <craigbdaniel@gmail.com> wrote:
True, but it's hard to argue that Germanic languages had nearly as
much = influence on Spanish as, say, Arabic.

Given that the V= andals & esp. the Visigoths came into Spain in some numbers, before the= Spanish languages distinguished themselves from Latin, I'm not sure it's t= hat hard to argue.

mu'o mi'e komfo,amonan

------=_Part_6525_29018613.1133900910364--