From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Thu Jan 05 04:31:51 2006 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Thu, 05 Jan 2006 04:31:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1EuUHF-0006CN-Po for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Thu, 05 Jan 2006 04:31:33 -0800 Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.200]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1EuUHE-0006CF-60 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 05 Jan 2006 04:31:33 -0800 Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 68so2459703wri for ; Thu, 05 Jan 2006 04:31:30 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=jPc3FrRCJWEhu0KKDhPHV/rTvKdqdH9eugbO7T43PmNHLAE6FtvKNE+InFd3YBXU444uixKSUeLuIQWEypemp1UwQu0HPGwkEBOCgjjgd+3X+RmTswdsEYwPJcSEqjpVfqG2swD7Hs72IxKyQP6y6p+v1L3+Eb2hlplJ4+48ANU= Received: by 10.54.110.19 with SMTP id i19mr3770767wrc; Thu, 05 Jan 2006 04:31:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.68.7 with HTTP; Thu, 5 Jan 2006 04:31:30 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <925d17560601050431i1eb4186bx69847bbda3144d4e@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2006 09:31:30 -0300 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: stage 1 and 2 non-fu'ivla In-Reply-To: <20060105063129.GY3931@chain.digitalkingdom.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis Content-Disposition: inline References: <20060105063129.GY3931@chain.digitalkingdom.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-archive-position: 10996 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On 1/5/06, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > I don't consider stage 1 and stage 2 borrowings to be fu'ivla, > because to me fu'ivla means "single brivla that is based on a > borrowing from another language". > > How do other people feel about this? I think cmevla should be a class of brivla. Stage 1 are quoted text, so they are not even borrowings. mu'o mi'e xorxes To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.