From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Sat Jan 28 09:32:17 2006 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sat, 28 Jan 2006 09:32:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1F2tvc-0000Ap-4Z for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Sat, 28 Jan 2006 09:32:00 -0800 Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.192]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1F2tvb-0000Ah-8C for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sat, 28 Jan 2006 09:31:59 -0800 Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i13so846516wra for ; Sat, 28 Jan 2006 09:31:57 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=QTbZyKWwhRJfqas3UP3g21HHrhBySVeFY7jD/2mM6xuteIV0sMKkj5rRgNJa/VeNhvEvmxaKZbc3H4sgZcgLKg2jWzVakrs2BNtAhV/P0HX/rYMlHZYkhikoftqdIrhgJ+JLVHjwmp7szyGqomYwNBrbRLUz3wxsJLw9/dPSH6E= Received: by 10.54.138.6 with SMTP id l6mr4934163wrd; Sat, 28 Jan 2006 09:31:56 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.124.13 with HTTP; Sat, 28 Jan 2006 09:31:56 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4c4e58c10601280931v7863ee0fi68990d4730cae0d@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2006 17:31:56 +0000 From: Evgeny Sklyanin To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: Multiple bridi within an abstraction In-Reply-To: <1897047165.20060128111759@mail.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_8695_20114210.1138469516906" References: <1897047165.20060128111759@mail.ru> X-Spam-Score: -1.8 (-) X-archive-position: 11085 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: eks2005@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list ------=_Part_8695_20114210.1138469516906 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline An "event" abstraction makes sense only if the events combined together happen at the same time. One therefore can try the temporal marker {ca} mi nelci le nu mi pinxe le birje ca le nu le bersa be mi cu kelci =3D "I li= ke to drink beer while my son is playing." In this way it is difficult to combine more than two sentences. Another suggestion: use topic-comment construction: le fasnu noi mi nelci zo'u tu'e mi pinxe le birje .ije le bersa be mi cu kelci tu'i =3D The event I like: "I drink beer and my son plays". mi'e .evgenis. ------=_Part_8695_20114210.1138469516906 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline An "event" abstraction makes sense only if the events combined to= gether happen at the same time. One therefore can try  the temporal ma= rker {ca}

mi nelci le nu mi pinxe le birje ca le nu le bersa be mi c= u kelci =3D "I like to drink beer while my son is playing."

In this way it is difficult to combine more than two sentences. Ano= ther suggestion: use topic-comment construction:

le fasnu noi mi nel= ci zo'u tu'e mi pinxe le birje .ije le bersa be mi cu kelci tu'i

=3D The event I like: "I drink beer and my son plays".

mi'= e .evgenis.

------=_Part_8695_20114210.1138469516906-- To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.