From lojban-out@lojban.org Thu Jan 05 10:40:12 2006 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 76882 invoked from network); 5 Jan 2006 18:40:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217) by m31.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 5 Jan 2006 18:40:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.81.49.134) by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 5 Jan 2006 18:40:11 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1EuZyq-0002DX-K7 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Thu, 05 Jan 2006 10:36:56 -0800 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.49.134]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1EuZy8-0002D2-0b; Thu, 05 Jan 2006 10:36:14 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Thu, 05 Jan 2006 10:36:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1EuZxh-0002Ct-Qw for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Thu, 05 Jan 2006 10:35:45 -0800 Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1EuZxh-0002Ck-I5 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 05 Jan 2006 10:35:45 -0800 Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2006 10:35:45 -0800 Message-ID: <20060105183545.GD4710@chain.digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-archive-position: 10999 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-list: lojban-list X-Spam-Score: -3.4 (---) To: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-Originating-IP: 64.81.49.134 X-eGroups-Msg-Info: 1:12:0:0 X-eGroups-From: Robin Lee Powell From: Robin Lee Powell Reply-To: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Subject: [lojban] ki restriction? X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790; y=qcMgEFhJAiqBFXNlhHHjxdWy4HjL2nDyQGO8DNnECF-rYOn91g X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 25398 The RefGram says: Note: Modals made with ``fi'o''-plus-selbri cannot be made sticky. This is an unfortunate, but unavoidable, restriction. in Chapter 9, Section 14. What does this mean? All three parsers accept "fi'o ki broda da brode". 2 out of 3 accept "fi'o broda ki da brode", so it doesn't seem to be a grammatical restriction. I don't get it. -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/ Reason #237 To Learn Lojban: "Homonyms: Their Grate!" Proud Supporter of the Singularity Institute - http://singinst.org/ To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.