From lojban-out@lojban.org Thu Jan 05 10:56:42 2006
Return-Path: <lojban-out@lojban.org>
X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (qmail 55548 invoked from network); 5 Jan 2006 18:56:41 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.172)
  by m23.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 5 Jan 2006 18:56:41 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.81.49.134)
  by mta4.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 5 Jan 2006 18:56:41 -0000
Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <lojban-out@lojban.org>)
	id 1EuaEp-0002OC-8Y
	for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Thu, 05 Jan 2006 10:53:27 -0800
Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.49.134])
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org>)
	id 1EuaEF-0002Nm-3n; Thu, 05 Jan 2006 10:52:53 -0800
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Thu, 05 Jan 2006 10:52:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <nobody@digitalkingdom.org>)
	id 1EuaDp-0002Nc-Uk
	for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Thu, 05 Jan 2006 10:52:26 -0800
Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.194])
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <jjllambias@gmail.com>)
	id 1EuaDm-0002NV-UN
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 05 Jan 2006 10:52:25 -0800
Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 68so2531474wri
        for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Thu, 05 Jan 2006 10:52:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.54.114.4 with SMTP id m4mr4215330wrc;
        Thu, 05 Jan 2006 10:52:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.54.68.7 with HTTP; Thu, 5 Jan 2006 10:52:21 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <925d17560601051052j1323edc0od2c9c142937ec5c3@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2006 15:52:21 -0300
In-Reply-To: <20060105183545.GD4710@chain.digitalkingdom.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <20060105183545.GD4710@chain.digitalkingdom.org>
X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--)
X-archive-position: 11001
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: jjllambias@gmail.com
X-list: lojban-list
X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--)
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
X-Originating-IP: 64.81.49.134
X-eGroups-Msg-Info: 1:12:0:0
X-eGroups-From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= <jjllambias@gmail.com>
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= <lojban-out@lojban.org>
Reply-To: jjllambias@gmail.com
Subject: [lojban] Re: ki restriction?
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790; y=L91DKDgkh3DPyNnHNQdKI2xmPCjz83pVa0ElJ8W3FT0lL5_FRQ
X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out
X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 25400

On 1/5/06, Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org> wrote:
>
> The RefGram says:
>
>  Note: Modals made with ``fi'o''-plus-selbri cannot be made sticky.
>  This is an unfortunate, but unavoidable, restriction.
>
> in Chapter 9, Section 14.
>
> What does this mean?
>
> All three parsers accept "fi'o ki broda da brode".

That's different, {ki} there is a tag on broda, not on brode.

> 2 out of 3
> accept "fi'o broda ki da brode", so it doesn't seem to be a
> grammatical restriction.

That would be {fi'o broda [ku] ki da brode}. Here the term {ki da}
is a separate term from the term {fi'o broda ku}.

> I don't get it.

This is a proposal for how the grammar of tags could be cleaned up:

<http://www.lojban.org/tiki/tiki-index.php?page=Internal+grammar+of+tags>

mu'o mi'e xorxes


To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org
with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if
you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.