From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Mon Mar 20 13:33:43 2006
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 20 Mar 2006 13:33:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.60)	(envelope-from <nobody@digitalkingdom.org>)	id 1FLS0D-0007Sj-8A	for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Mon, 20 Mar 2006 13:33:25 -0800
Received: from web81311.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([68.142.199.127])	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.60)	(envelope-from <clifford-j@sbcglobal.net>)	id 1FLS09-0007SX-VG	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 20 Mar 2006 13:33:24 -0800
Received: (qmail 35999 invoked by uid 60001); 20 Mar 2006 21:33:19 -0000
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;  s=s1024; d=sbcglobal.net;  h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding;  b=rrm/VuCgYCEM04B+8QAw+M2sB5enS77OigoC4AY12GHMd96D28qMeQxaVI2Q3YIYScUXbTgkD5opJZV/HtOpqoMWiG/D4Vr858oWEQWp31OAI+hQCTuI1t91HSZL8FFhQpgLi2cCtawUEGFAZYD/4XgF6IsPi1yrqTOTFX03xr8=  ;
Message-ID: <20060320213319.35997.qmail@web81311.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Received: from [70.230.183.14] by web81311.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 20 Mar 2006 13:33:19 PST
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 13:33:19 -0800 (PST)
From: John E Clifford <clifford-j@sbcglobal.net>
Subject: [lojban] Re: x2 of klesi
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
In-Reply-To: <20060320232412.N71718@mail.sksys.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/)
X-archive-position: 11187
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: clifford-j@sbcglobal.net
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-list

Well, xorxes doesn't want to get involved in yet
another {lo} discussion, and this will lead into
that almost surely.  But, assuming there is beer
and alcohol (and a few other assumptions), I
don't see why this won't work:  "Beer is a kind
of alcohol."

--- Cyril Slobin <slobin@sksys.net> wrote:

> On Mon, 20 Mar 2006, John E Clifford wrote:
> 
> >> What kind of sumti can fill x2 place of
> {klesi}?
> 
> > Well it's tempting to read the palces of
> {klesi}
> > as genus, species and differens, but that is
> not
> > absolutely required: x1 might be definable
> > segment of any plurality or mass (in the usal
> > sense, not the Lojbanic).
> 
> So is it legal to say {lo birje cu klesi lo
> xalka}?
> 
> The question is in fact about {lo}, not about
> {klesi}.
> 
> -- 
> Cyril Slobin <slobin@sksys.net>
> 
> 
> To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to
> lojban-list-request@lojban.org
> with the subject unsubscribe, or go to
> http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if
> you're really stuck, send mail to
> secretary@lojban.org for help.
> 
> 



To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org
with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if
you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.