From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Tue Mar 21 06:22:02 2006 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 21 Mar 2006 06:22:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1FLhjx-0001v6-DD for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Tue, 21 Mar 2006 06:21:41 -0800 Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.207]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1FLhjv-0001uz-Bz for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 21 Mar 2006 06:21:41 -0800 Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i32so1292566wra for ; Tue, 21 Mar 2006 06:21:38 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=eW71864vd4oEQJcwx7knbdDO0Rea8iSg6VIMPXj6rD4kB6JyBMzrHswChAc1EPb/eTc6KhN4B0lN5jmRMnI+JmxtvrQ16kUFWXFudE7UVhhinNbqTdAl0UfclWIuZlOlxbjOi6L84gWro5WjOEmOfeWeABrp6d8MSmJ3Mp/taGc= Received: by 10.54.142.8 with SMTP id p8mr4334217wrd; Tue, 21 Mar 2006 06:21:37 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.67.10 with HTTP; Tue, 21 Mar 2006 06:21:37 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <925d17560603210621u5f72b95fj908ac02a67907b94@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 11:21:37 -0300 From: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?=" To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: sumti with relative clause In-Reply-To: <20060321170502.R49527@mail.sksys.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis Content-Disposition: inline References: <20060321170502.R49527@mail.sksys.net> X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-archive-position: 11194 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On 3/21/06, Cyril Slobin wrote: > coi rodo > > Playing jboselkei, I was to comment the translation containing {ro > nae'bo la djil noi zutse}. I am in doubt whether {noi zutse} applies > only to {la djil} (as author of translation assumes) or to the whole > sumti {ro na'ebo la djil} (as I guess)? Jbofi'e output is opaque. > > Which version is correct? Only to {la djil}. To get the other meaning, you need to use the LAhE/NAhE-BO terminator, which is LUhU: {ro na'e bo la djil lu'u noi zutse} mu'o mi'e xorxes To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.