From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Sun Mar 26 08:12:45 2006 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sun, 26 Mar 2006 08:12:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1FNXqq-0001IK-Ql for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 08:12:25 -0800 Received: from imo-d20.mx.aol.com ([205.188.139.136]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1FNXqo-0001I9-BK for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 08:12:24 -0800 Received: from MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com by imo-d20.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r7.3.) id d.2ad.762bd6 (57341) for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 11:12:19 -0500 (EST) From: MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com Message-ID: <2ad.762bd6.31581763@wmconnect.com> Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 11:12:19 EST Subject: [lojban] "OPPOSITE" To: lojban-list@lojban.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_2ad.762bd6.31581763_boundary" X-Mailer: 6.0 for Windows XP sub 52 X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.9 (/) X-archive-position: 11248 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list --part1_2ad.762bd6.31581763_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 3/26/2006 4:22:00 AM Central Standard Time, ecartis@digitalkingdom.org writes: > Ok, but a claim that there are other reasons is not > as convincing as the reasons themselves might > eventually be. I am not saying that OPPOSITE > has to be a prime, all I'm saying is that it is odd > that they wouldn't have it as a prime, given that > it's so productive. (And also given that I can't > imagine what it's paraphrase in terms of the > given primes might be.) > It seems that "NOT" would provide the meaning of "OPPOSITE". stevo --part1_2ad.762bd6.31581763_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In a message dated 3/26/2006 4:22:0= 0 AM Central Standard Time, ecartis@digitalkingdom.org writes:


Ok, but a claim that there=20= are other reasons is not
as convincing as the reasons themselves might
eventually be. I am not saying that OPPOSITE
has to be a prime, all I'm saying is that it is odd
that they wouldn't have it as a prime, given that
it's so productive. (And also given that I can't
imagine what it's paraphrase in terms of the
given primes might be.)


It seems that "NOT" would provide the meaning of "OPPOSITE".

stevo
--part1_2ad.762bd6.31581763_boundary-- To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.