From lojban-out@lojban.org Wed Mar 22 07:49:25 2006 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 95145 invoked from network); 22 Mar 2006 15:49:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.67.33) by m33.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 22 Mar 2006 15:49:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.81.49.134) by mta7.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 22 Mar 2006 15:49:22 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1FM5aK-0005ZM-3f for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Wed, 22 Mar 2006 07:49:20 -0800 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.49.134]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1FM5ZZ-0005Xz-Ry; Wed, 22 Mar 2006 07:48:34 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 22 Mar 2006 07:48:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1FM5Z4-0005Xh-7W for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Wed, 22 Mar 2006 07:48:02 -0800 Received: from zproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.162.195]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1FM5Yy-0005Wx-7P for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 22 Mar 2006 07:48:01 -0800 Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id x7so189394nzc for ; Wed, 22 Mar 2006 07:47:55 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.36.60.13 with SMTP id i13mr1489326nza; Wed, 22 Mar 2006 07:47:54 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.37.20.27 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Mar 2006 07:47:54 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 10:47:54 -0500 In-Reply-To: <925d17560603220737i162d9245g85b0cc08245fb89@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_17386_14819440.1143042474883" References: <06bc01c64dc3$3be85080$a0d2400a@caroe1> <925d17560603220737i162d9245g85b0cc08245fb89@mail.gmail.com> X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-archive-position: 11213 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: matt.mattarn@gmail.com X-list: lojban-list X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) To: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-Originating-IP: 64.81.49.134 X-eGroups-Msg-Info: 1:12:0:0 X-eGroups-From: "Matt Arnold" From: "Matt Arnold" Reply-To: matt.mattarn@gmail.com Subject: [lojban] Re: A comment on one of my jboselkei translations X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790; y=rrg6Oz2ULRPYT6dXgWdmXkHeRsLHXh8eZt844R6m9A5cmCG36Q X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 25623 ------=_Part_17386_14819440.1143042474883 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On 3/22/06, Jorge Llamb=EDas wrote: > > On 3/22/06, Betsemes wrote: > > I have a question. I was under the impression that when we add a spatia= l > > tense followed by a sumti, we are really adding a tense sumti that > applies > > to the entire bridi. So I thought that here {pa'o} applied to the event > of > > seeing instead of applying to just one of the sumtis (the girl); and I > was > > under the impression that in order for it to apply to the girl, it > should > > have been written as {mi viska lo lunbe nixli pe pa'o lo canko be lo > ragve > > dinju ca le cabycerni} thus associating the tense directly to the sumti ------=_Part_17386_14819440.1143042474883--