From lojban-out@lojban.org Sun Apr 02 23:39:30 2006 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 63245 invoked from network); 3 Apr 2006 06:39:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.67.33) by m34.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 3 Apr 2006 06:39:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.81.49.134) by mta7.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 3 Apr 2006 06:39:28 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1FQIia-0003VZ-Eq for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Sun, 02 Apr 2006 23:39:16 -0700 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.49.134]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1FQIgd-0003U4-AF; Sun, 02 Apr 2006 23:37:15 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sun, 02 Apr 2006 23:37:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1FQIgB-0003T9-LM for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Sun, 02 Apr 2006 23:36:47 -0700 Received: from [166.82.175.165] (helo=blackcat.ixazon.lan) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1FQIg8-0003T1-2L for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sun, 02 Apr 2006 23:36:47 -0700 Received: by blackcat.ixazon.lan (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BB1821B09; Mon, 3 Apr 2006 06:37:19 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2006 01:37:06 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200604030237.12321.phma@phma.optus.nu> X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) X-archive-position: 11291 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: phma@phma.optus.nu X-list: lojban-list X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) To: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-Originating-IP: 64.81.49.134 X-eGroups-Msg-Info: 1:12:0:0 X-eGroups-From: Pierre Abbat From: Pierre Abbat Reply-To: phma@phma.optus.nu Subject: [lojban] Place structure of {fu'ivla} X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790; y=BlBc8RmD7Do9MS2T2JWZktuZ01DEwT9e2yWGvVDdfkrpGYjGAw X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 25702 I'm looking at the definition in jbovlaste of {fu'ivla} and x4 is unclear (which is typical of definitions entered by noralujv). Is it the language the word came from, or the form of the word in that language? Which of these is correct?: .i zo skomberu fu'ivla lu finpe da li'u lo lojbo zoi ly. Scomber .ly .i zo skomberu fu'ivla lu finpe da li'u lo lojbo lo latmo Or should they both be included?: .i zo skomberu fu'ivla lu finpe da li'u lo lojbo zoi ly. Scomber .ly lo latmo (I am ignoring how one would actually write a Lojban definition of {skomberu}.) phma To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.