From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Fri May 05 11:14:18 2006 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 05 May 2006 11:14:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.61) (envelope-from ) id 1Fc4oS-0005ue-Mq for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Fri, 05 May 2006 11:14:00 -0700 Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.184.236]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.61) (envelope-from ) id 1Fc4oQ-0005u9-ET for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 05 May 2006 11:14:00 -0700 Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i13so660281wra for ; Fri, 05 May 2006 11:13:56 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=F9Pco4zZLelyQDT6ZadnjGwZerjEGJHSbRazkrN43TGdYJfTMGONw4PMOftU6OMPGQje0hOAAgK4RC5jnhHMCoqT32NLzgI34XSTvWs3nXZDUHTu+LnEt2+JOXdOxJGeGKZ8djUcFsm2eaXNrk9v0qqqLySEHCBcV/n27UYArLU= Received: by 10.54.101.14 with SMTP id y14mr980025wrb; Fri, 05 May 2006 11:13:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.126.18 with HTTP; Fri, 5 May 2006 11:13:56 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <925d17560605051113t71268badp4718f18be021339@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 15:13:56 -0300 From: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?=" To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: jboselsla and the Michigan Lojbanists In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis Content-Disposition: inline References: X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-archive-position: 11395 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On 5/5/06, Matt Arnold wrote: > we wrote example bridi such > as {.i .u'u doi .can. mi pu pinxe lo do ckafi} and {.i doi .epkat. > pe'u e'o ga'inai ko dunda lo ckafi mi} Minor nitpick: You want {pe'u doi epkat} there, otherwise {pe'u} will absorb the {ko} and leave you with nothing in x1 of dunda. Not ungrammatical, but not what was meant. Life would be easier if most COIs were just in UI instead. mu'o mi'e xorxes To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.