From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Sun May 21 18:39:45 2006
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sun, 21 May 2006 18:39:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.61)	(envelope-from <nobody@digitalkingdom.org>)	id 1FhzOJ-0007jx-DB	for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Sun, 21 May 2006 18:39:27 -0700
Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com ([64.233.162.199])	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.61)	(envelope-from <maxim.katcharov@gmail.com>)	id 1FhzOG-0007jm-Sl	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sun, 21 May 2006 18:39:27 -0700
Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id f1so1057030nzc        for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Sun, 21 May 2006 18:39:24 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;        s=beta; d=gmail.com;        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;        b=fvQDanjxNVvdqwu+BfUNwpDSAUBnUHgG5XTQ9AKv9KD36jvWE2XAuxw9Fw8gIdUIjALiHGKbJ3oEzhus5gMWkfu3lQIsNqbS4KvA1nhETRnQtpwfVp7zXnhizPWnlto4uX2pi2QrRhXhZj6khl/BLs/rMuv0LjMxOrRskO6XsYs=
Received: by 10.37.20.49 with SMTP id x49mr5375004nzi;        Sun, 21 May 2006 18:39:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.36.153.14 with HTTP; Sun, 21 May 2006 18:39:23 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <ec8285e60605211839x4dd73c1ah318f195534a7a50f@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 19:39:23 -0600
From: "Maxim Katcharov" <maxim.katcharov@gmail.com>
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: A (rather long) discussion of {all}
In-Reply-To: <925d17560605211759s500cdb76kdae7425caf46c8f6@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <925d17560605160731j379ecfdbo42862a88433e112c@mail.gmail.com>
	 <925d17560605200715t32c87d1dpf95ffb3023c95526@mail.gmail.com>
	 <ec8285e60605201516t5a28ef9ay50de97af55ed9a4d@mail.gmail.com>
	 <925d17560605201618u41770ed9ob343bbe248e22606@mail.gmail.com>
	 <ec8285e60605201950q52e6996dm880fa21d68c2386a@mail.gmail.com>
	 <925d17560605210914u7d4863b7qbf4a28a5fe3e72ee@mail.gmail.com>
	 <ec8285e60605211519g676f3e23r9883f8265fc11407@mail.gmail.com>
	 <370394AC-290A-404D-BEC7-5466A31BC3C2@umich.edu>
	 <ec8285e60605211742o365100d9t596a5439bf2531b@mail.gmail.com>
	 <925d17560605211759s500cdb76kdae7425caf46c8f6@mail.gmail.com>
X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--)
X-archive-position: 11653
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: maxim.katcharov@gmail.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-list

On 5/21/06, Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 5/21/06, Maxim Katcharov <maxim.katcharov@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > - perhaps {ckini}
> > would be the proper corresponding gismu for {pe}? {srana} seems to
> > mean "x1 is about/based on the existence of x2", or "x1 is of interest
> > in some way to the understanding of x2".
>
> CLL gives {srana} for it.

I don't think {srana} is correct. If it is correct, then what do you
define srana as? And what's the difference between srana and ckini?

>
> That's vague enough, but {ckini} is perhaps excessivley vague, since
> anything is related to anything else by some relationship, so it would

Yes, I agree, though perhaps if it was defined as "related to x2 in
some coherent way"?

> be like no restriction at all. On the other hand, the mere presence of the
> sumti must pragmatically respond to some relevance, so I suppose
> {ckini} should work too.


To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org
with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if
you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.