From lojban-out@lojban.org Fri May 12 05:06:01 2006 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 13160 invoked from network); 12 May 2006 12:06:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.67.36) by m27.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 12 May 2006 12:06:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.81.49.134) by mta10.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 12 May 2006 12:06:00 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.61) (envelope-from ) id 1FeWP6-0001qZ-PC for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Fri, 12 May 2006 05:05:56 -0700 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.49.134]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.61) (envelope-from ) id 1FeWNz-0001pI-Cg; Fri, 12 May 2006 05:04:47 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 12 May 2006 05:04:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.61) (envelope-from ) id 1FeWNY-0001p9-I6 for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Fri, 12 May 2006 05:04:20 -0700 Received: from imo-d05.mx.aol.com ([205.188.157.37]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.61) (envelope-from ) id 1FeWNX-0001p2-9L for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 12 May 2006 05:04:20 -0700 Received: from MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com by imo-d05.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r7.5.) id d.448.3992a0 (63024) for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 08:04:12 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <448.3992a0.3195d3bc@wmconnect.com> Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 08:04:12 EDT MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_448.3992a0.3195d3bc_boundary" X-Mailer: 6.0 for Windows XP sub 11501 X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.9 (/) X-archive-position: 11511 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com X-list: lojban-list X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-) To: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-Originating-IP: 64.81.49.134 X-eGroups-Msg-Info: 1:12:0:0 X-eGroups-From: MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com From: lojban-out@lojban.org Reply-To: MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com Subject: [lojban] furry species? X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790; y=b24yKVRKgflwuz4oZ3-yRkORHR4CD0GQjBlTKgwTiFhkEgatOg X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 25928 --part1_448.3992a0.3195d3bc_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 5/12/2006 4:22:03 AM Central Standard Time, ecartis@digitalkingdom.org writes: > > As a separate thing, yes. But a kind of bear as bear has to go in x1. > > For example, I don't think you can say: > > > > ro se cribe cu se gacri lo kerfa > > Every species of bear (as a species) is covered by fur. > > > > mu'o mi'e xorxes > > > > Why not? It seems to parse just fine to me. > > mu'omi'e .aleks. > Bears have fur. Species don't have fur. stevo --part1_448.3992a0.3195d3bc_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In a message dated 5/12/2006 4:22= :03 AM Central Standard Time, ecartis@digitalkingdom.org writes:


> As a separate thing,= yes. But a kind of bear as bear has to go in x1.
> For example, I don't think you can say:
>
>   ro se cribe cu se gacri lo kerfa
>   Every species of bear (as a species) is covered by fur= .
>
> mu'o mi'e xorxes
>

Why not? It seems to parse just fine to me.

mu'omi'e .aleks.


Bears have fur.  Species don't have fur.

stevo --part1_448.3992a0.3195d3bc_boundary--