From lojban-out@lojban.org Thu May 11 16:20:38 2006 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 53975 invoked from network); 11 May 2006 23:20:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.166) by m29.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 11 May 2006 23:20:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.81.49.134) by mta5.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 11 May 2006 23:20:35 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.61) (envelope-from ) id 1FeKSP-000686-4i for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Thu, 11 May 2006 16:20:33 -0700 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.49.134]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.61) (envelope-from ) id 1FeKQc-00066T-U7; Thu, 11 May 2006 16:18:44 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Thu, 11 May 2006 16:18:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.61) (envelope-from ) id 1FeKQC-00066H-3H for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Thu, 11 May 2006 16:18:16 -0700 Received: from mx.211.ru ([193.238.131.194]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.61) (envelope-from ) id 1FeKQ9-00066A-Cm for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 11 May 2006 16:18:15 -0700 Received: from localhost (mx.211.ru [193.238.131.194]) by mx.211.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBB48EBC80 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 06:18:10 +0700 (NOVST) Received: from mx.211.ru ([193.238.131.194]) by localhost (mx.211.ru [193.238.131.194]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 11549-03 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 06:18:08 +0700 (NOVST) Received: from mail.211.ru (mail [10.5.1.2]) by mx.211.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB404EBC67 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 06:18:08 +0700 (NOVST) Received: from host-102-2-129.211.ru (host-102-2-129.211.ru [10.102.2.129]) by mail.211.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E9015C15 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 06:18:07 +0700 (NOVST) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 06:18:03 +0700 X-Mailer: The Bat! (v3.5.30) Professional X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <642247766.20060512061803@mail.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----------19F2212EF84B3B" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-archive-position: 11497 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: ybatura@mail.ru X-list: lojban-list X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) To: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-Originating-IP: 64.81.49.134 X-eGroups-From: Yanis Batura From: Yanis Batura Reply-To: ybatura@mail.ru Subject: [lojban] {.i} in dialogues X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790; y=2jSKbylACTywOaI37VBgWQs0szWZhPBpwVh2wP66jUj1xX78MA X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 25914 ------------19F2212EF84B3B Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit coi ro do la lojban. cinri This question has arisen during the translation of the dialogues http://www.lojban.org/tiki/tiki-index.php?page=Everyday+Lojban+B01 It is understandable that in speech of the same speaker, {.i} is required to separate bridi one from another. At the same time, the first bridi doesn't require {.i} in front of it. In a dialogue, is {.i} required for the first bridi of B when A has just said something? mi'e .ianis. ------------19F2212EF84B3B Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

coi ro do la lojban. cinri

This question has arisen during the translation of the dialogues

http://www.lojban.org/tiki/tiki-index.php?page=Everyday+Lojban+B01

It is understandable that in speech of the same speaker, {.i} is required to separate bridi one from another. At the same time, the first bridi doesn't require {.i} in front of it.

In a dialogue, is {.i} required for the first bridi of B when A has just said something?

mi'e .ianis.

------------19F2212EF84B3B--