From lojban-out@lojban.org Thu May 04 05:36:51 2006 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 57380 invoked from network); 4 May 2006 12:36:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.167) by m27.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 4 May 2006 12:36:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.81.49.134) by mta6.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 4 May 2006 12:36:49 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.61) (envelope-from ) id 1Fbd4W-0008D4-PA for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Thu, 04 May 2006 05:36:45 -0700 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.49.134]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.61) (envelope-from ) id 1Fbd2a-0007Zc-IX; Thu, 04 May 2006 05:34:51 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Thu, 04 May 2006 05:34:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.61) (envelope-from ) id 1Fbd1n-0007YI-Mr for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Thu, 04 May 2006 05:33:56 -0700 Received: from web81312.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([68.142.199.128]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.61) (envelope-from ) id 1Fbd1k-0007Y6-MA for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 04 May 2006 05:33:54 -0700 Received: (qmail 37137 invoked by uid 60001); 4 May 2006 12:33:51 -0000 Message-ID: <20060504123351.37135.qmail@web81312.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [70.230.152.10] by web81312.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 04 May 2006 05:33:51 PDT Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 05:33:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1726180656.20060504154405@mail.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/) X-archive-position: 11371 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: clifford-j@sbcglobal.net X-list: lojban-list X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/) To: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-Originating-IP: 64.81.49.134 X-eGroups-Msg-Info: 1:12:0:0 X-eGroups-From: John E Clifford From: John E Clifford Reply-To: clifford-j@sbcglobal.net Subject: [lojban] Re: ralju bangu be le gligu'e X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790; y=sxv5tzqzjY-P3EO5wLnTgpAE1---BFrxnnf7Y6OctkMTAmBN5Q X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 25787 The latter; tanru function as units wherever the sumti happen to attach. (Arguments for the opposite side exist.) --- Yanis Batura wrote: > coi ro do la lojban. banli > > In Wikipedian article > http://jbo.wikipedia.org/wiki/glico_bangu > there is a phrase {ralju bangu be le gligu'e}. > My question is, is {ralju} a seltau for the > tertau {bangu be le > gligu'e}, or {be le gligu'e} is an attached > sumti for the selbri > {ralju bangu}? > > mi'e .ianis. > > > > To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to > lojban-list-request@lojban.org > with the subject unsubscribe, or go to > http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if > you're really stuck, send mail to > secretary@lojban.org for help. > > To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.