From lojban-out@lojban.org Thu May 04 06:21:24 2006
Return-Path: <lojban-out@lojban.org>
X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (qmail 8802 invoked from network); 4 May 2006 13:16:39 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.67.36)
  by m25.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 4 May 2006 13:16:39 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.81.49.134)
  by mta10.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 4 May 2006 13:16:39 -0000
Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.61)
	(envelope-from <lojban-out@lojban.org>)
	id 1Fbdh2-0000jI-Kn
	for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Thu, 04 May 2006 06:16:32 -0700
Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.49.134])
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.61)
	(envelope-from <lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org>)
	id 1FbdfL-0000gx-LK; Thu, 04 May 2006 06:14:51 -0700
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Thu, 04 May 2006 06:14:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.61)	(envelope-from <nobody@digitalkingdom.org>)	id 1Fbdeq-0000gg-69	for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Thu, 04 May 2006 06:14:16 -0700
Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.184.237])	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.61)	(envelope-from <jjllambias@gmail.com>)	id 1Fbdem-0000gW-AK	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 04 May 2006 06:14:15 -0700
Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i13so366141wra        for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Thu, 04 May 2006 06:14:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.54.117.4 with SMTP id p4mr683297wrc;        Thu, 04 May 2006 06:14:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.54.126.18 with HTTP; Thu, 4 May 2006 06:14:08 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <925d17560605040614k3bfb6ea3r4dcdfe7aa6533e4c@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 10:14:08 -0300
In-Reply-To: <1726180656.20060504154405@mail.ru>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <1726180656.20060504154405@mail.ru>
X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--)
X-archive-position: 11373
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: jjllambias@gmail.com
X-list: lojban-list
X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--)
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
X-Originating-IP: 64.81.49.134
X-eGroups-Msg-Info: 1:12:0:0
X-eGroups-From: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?=" <jjllambias@gmail.com>
From: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?=" <lojban-out@lojban.org>
Reply-To: jjllambias@gmail.com
Subject: [lojban] Re: ralju bangu be le gligu'e
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790; y=0BOLX4kNMJ92mHU2yviE2ZUmQ2XSAlXeHdo46fV31AHmNdcEVg
X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out
X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 25789

On 5/4/06, Yanis Batura <ybatura@mail.ru> wrote:
> In Wikipedian article http://jbo.wikipedia.org/wiki/glico_bangu
> there is a phrase {ralju bangu be le gligu'e}.
> My question is, is {ralju} a seltau for the tertau {bangu be le
> gligu'e}, or {be le gligu'e} is an attached sumti for the selbri
> {ralju bangu}?

The former. For the latter, you can say {ke ralju bangu ke'e
be le gligu'e}. {be} attaches a sumti to the single tanru unit
to its left.

{bangu be le gliselgu'e} would be more appropriate, since it is the
people who use the language, not the country.

mu'o mi'e xorxes


To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org
with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if
you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.