From lojban-out@lojban.org Thu Jun 29 06:43:04 2006 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 68670 invoked from network); 29 Jun 2006 13:26:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.172) by m34.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 29 Jun 2006 13:26:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.81.49.134) by mta4.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 29 Jun 2006 13:26:34 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1FvwXG-0007S4-RS for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Thu, 29 Jun 2006 06:26:22 -0700 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.49.134]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1FvwVI-0007Qc-AG; Thu, 29 Jun 2006 06:24:20 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Thu, 29 Jun 2006 06:24:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1FvwUn-0007QI-Q3 for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Thu, 29 Jun 2006 06:23:49 -0700 Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.174]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1FvwUl-0007Q9-K6 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 29 Jun 2006 06:23:49 -0700 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id j40so300746ugd for ; Thu, 29 Jun 2006 06:23:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.157.8 with SMTP id f8mr1010799hue; Thu, 29 Jun 2006 06:23:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.13.6 with HTTP; Thu, 29 Jun 2006 06:23:46 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <2d3df92a0606290623h2e3acad9jc93639aa87df9e44@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 15:23:46 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20060628220136.22537.qmail@web81303.mail.mud.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_19045_6226799.1151587426070" References: <737b61f30606281242y68b8291fh2fa172f439b268c5@mail.gmail.com> <20060628220136.22537.qmail@web81303.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-Spam-Score: -1.8 (-) X-archive-position: 11851 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: exitconsole@gmail.com X-list: lojban-list X-Spam-Score: -1.8 (-) To: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-Originating-IP: 64.81.49.134 X-eGroups-Msg-Info: 1:0:0:0 X-eGroups-From: HeliodoR From: HeliodoR Reply-To: exitconsole@gmail.com Subject: [lojban] Re: plural markers? X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790; y=VXl0TrdIEc1bPxMzcNuRzhjGB8JxtEEvnN2ucFsKGtfOGNYgGw X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 26276 ------=_Part_19045_6226799.1151587426070 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline > > I took it as {ta'e} or some such, since I couldn't find it either. "Although in most of the cases the lack of this {su'o re} doesn't lead to ambiguity." (...because it excludes only one case, if we're talking about integer quantities.) > Maybe he has just come to this point of view. It is a characteristic of the language, so I couldn't come to another one. :) mi'e darves ------=_Part_19045_6226799.1151587426070 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline
I took it as {ta'e} or some such, since I couldn't
find it either.
 
"Although in most of the cases the lack of this {su'o re}
doesn't lead to ambiguity."
(...because it excludes only one case, if we're talking
about integer quantities.)
 
Maybe he has just come to this point of view.
 
It is a characteristic of the language, so I couldn't
come to another one. :)
 
mi'e darves
------=_Part_19045_6226799.1151587426070--