From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Fri Jul 07 21:15:42 2006 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 07 Jul 2006 21:15:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1Fz4Dy-0008Si-8a for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Fri, 07 Jul 2006 21:15:22 -0700 Received: from py-out-1112.google.com ([64.233.166.179]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1Fz4Dw-0008Sa-Bb for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 07 Jul 2006 21:15:22 -0700 Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id i49so786637pyi for ; Fri, 07 Jul 2006 21:15:19 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:x-accept-language:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=YBGF1CMUzeJUME2ya0R2gjedIN2jNtjLAjylk67G5phxUGZuhmImh7p0n5LoRl4sYPqS4H1HmlyBvcO2dKEEBOgPVo8w8Ns7waYicaWtC0cGuHIjl1z+oR+K78piiMcvbISekINlz19/I/WMXBwFbD7h8elirwHIeb1wU15kSJ8= Received: by 10.35.132.13 with SMTP id j13mr1013762pyn; Fri, 07 Jul 2006 21:15:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.1.100? ( [70.224.74.45]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id b52sm1237997pyb.2006.07.07.21.15.18; Fri, 07 Jul 2006 21:15:18 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <44AF3099.6060800@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 08 Jul 2006 00:12:09 -0400 From: Hugh O'Byrne User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: Evaluating gismu References: <2d3df92a0607031023g1938d482vf61486823468b3af@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) X-archive-position: 11977 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: hobyrne@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list Arnt Richard Johansen wrote: > On Mon, 3 Jul 2006, HeliodoR wrote: > >> coi ro do >> >> Does anyone know where the original method for evaluating >> proposed gismu can be found? If not, how can one get to a >> decision regarding the form of new experimental gismu? > > The Complete Lojban Language, chapter 4, section 14. > > http://www.lojban.org/tiki/tiki-download_wiki_attachment.php?attId=194#s14 Heh - it just occurred to me. This algorithm calculates the 'scoring' of similarity of words based purely on phonemes. The algorithm could be adapted to score on phoneme-features, to more accurately measure how 'close' sounds are to each other... -- Good night, and have a rational tomorrow! mi'e .xius. To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.