From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Sat Jul 08 10:47:38 2006 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sat, 08 Jul 2006 10:47:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1FzGtk-0005cV-4J for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Sat, 08 Jul 2006 10:47:20 -0700 Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.188]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1FzGtj-0005cN-7M for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sat, 08 Jul 2006 10:47:19 -0700 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id b2so215641nfe for ; Sat, 08 Jul 2006 10:47:17 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=Hfik66ZN9EDsEv8a0A/zYmQpsjKxm14EYujozzlei5TRqQeJDJKOnQYpWX28ZBF2xg2XZ3iNZExg6ulej9ow5iVFsYbS2SZXcGFDUeMHsSytqxdxHHjp/uwq1eLKgpXd5oamQFoYiC+beppbIxMgbGSTEW65rvMtSh14IB5Ee1Y= Received: by 10.78.179.12 with SMTP id b12mr1161206huf; Sat, 08 Jul 2006 10:47:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.13.6 with HTTP; Sat, 8 Jul 2006 10:47:17 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <2d3df92a0607081047i5ba3e2b5ucf79eaf3bed81d4a@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 19:47:17 +0200 From: HeliodoR To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: Alphabet proposal one. In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_30755_18835563.1152380837733" References: <44AD673B.7060501@gmail.com> <925d17560607061651p19623e56x7c188368533f9c48@mail.gmail.com> <20060706235433.GJ18983@chain.digitalkingdom.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.1 (--) X-archive-position: 11998 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: exitconsole@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list ------=_Part_30755_18835563.1152380837733 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline > > > On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 08:51:09PM -0300, Jorge Llamb?as wrote: > > > If the CLL or the BPFK ever come to treat the question, my vote > > > will be for it not to declare any alphabet official, since I don't > > > really see the point of having an official alphabet. > > > > That would be my inclination as well. > > And mine. I tend to think that the "Usage will determine" plays into this > well. i'e I share this opinion too. ------=_Part_30755_18835563.1152380837733 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline
> On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 08:51:09PM -0300, Jorge Llamb?as wrote:
> > If the CLL or the BPFK ever come to treat the question, my vote
> > will be for it not to declare any alphabet official, since I don't
> > really see the point of having an official alphabet.
>
> That would be my inclination as well.

And mine. I tend to think that the "Usage will determine" plays into this well.
 
i'e
I share this opinion too.
------=_Part_30755_18835563.1152380837733-- To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.