From lojban-out@lojban.org Sat Jul 08 11:53:17 2006 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 38568 invoked from network); 8 Jul 2006 17:57:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217) by m31.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 8 Jul 2006 17:57:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.81.49.134) by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 8 Jul 2006 17:57:21 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1FzGvs-0005e9-C5 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Sat, 08 Jul 2006 10:49:32 -0700 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.49.134]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1FzGuA-0005cf-O7; Sat, 08 Jul 2006 10:47:47 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sat, 08 Jul 2006 10:47:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1FzGtk-0005cV-4J for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Sat, 08 Jul 2006 10:47:20 -0700 Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.188]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1FzGtj-0005cN-7M for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sat, 08 Jul 2006 10:47:19 -0700 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id b2so215641nfe for ; Sat, 08 Jul 2006 10:47:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.179.12 with SMTP id b12mr1161206huf; Sat, 08 Jul 2006 10:47:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.13.6 with HTTP; Sat, 8 Jul 2006 10:47:17 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <2d3df92a0607081047i5ba3e2b5ucf79eaf3bed81d4a@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 19:47:17 +0200 In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_30755_18835563.1152380837733" References: <44AD673B.7060501@gmail.com> <925d17560607061651p19623e56x7c188368533f9c48@mail.gmail.com> <20060706235433.GJ18983@chain.digitalkingdom.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.1 (--) X-archive-position: 11998 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: exitconsole@gmail.com X-list: lojban-list X-Spam-Score: -2.1 (--) To: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-Originating-IP: 64.81.49.134 X-eGroups-Msg-Info: 1:0:0:0 X-eGroups-From: HeliodoR From: HeliodoR Reply-To: exitconsole@gmail.com Subject: [lojban] Re: Alphabet proposal one. X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790; y=5VvQbALXXUDDonu8o2MhCMoCDgOMF3pYZO4YyHV63VAa2QEPfA X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 26426 ------=_Part_30755_18835563.1152380837733 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline > > > On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 08:51:09PM -0300, Jorge Llamb?as wrote: > > > If the CLL or the BPFK ever come to treat the question, my vote > > > will be for it not to declare any alphabet official, since I don't > > > really see the point of having an official alphabet. > > > > That would be my inclination as well. > > And mine. I tend to think that the "Usage will determine" plays into this > well. i'e I share this opinion too. ------=_Part_30755_18835563.1152380837733 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline
> On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 08:51:09PM -0300, Jorge Llamb?as wrote:
> > If the CLL or the BPFK ever come to treat the question, my vote
> > will be for it not to declare any alphabet official, since I don't
> > really see the point of having an official alphabet.
>
> That would be my inclination as well.

And mine. I tend to think that the "Usage will determine" plays into this well.
 
i'e
I share this opinion too.
------=_Part_30755_18835563.1152380837733--