From lojban-out@lojban.org Sat Jul 08 11:54:14 2006 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 44970 invoked from network); 8 Jul 2006 18:39:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.172) by m29.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 8 Jul 2006 18:39:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.81.49.134) by mta4.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 8 Jul 2006 18:39:32 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1FzHiD-0006bN-2s for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Sat, 08 Jul 2006 11:39:29 -0700 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.49.134]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1FzHhE-0006a0-3p; Sat, 08 Jul 2006 11:38:30 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sat, 08 Jul 2006 11:38:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1FzHgl-0006Zc-FE for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Sat, 08 Jul 2006 11:37:59 -0700 Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.184]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1FzHgi-0006ZV-Vc for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sat, 08 Jul 2006 11:37:59 -0700 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id b2so221384nfe for ; Sat, 08 Jul 2006 11:37:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.140.17 with SMTP id n17mr1177901hud; Sat, 08 Jul 2006 11:37:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.13.6 with HTTP; Sat, 8 Jul 2006 11:37:55 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <2d3df92a0607081137k3a3766cqf95a806b7a44ee39@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 20:37:55 +0200 In-Reply-To: <1565464009.20060709001700@mail.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_31328_5418433.1152383875763" References: <1836234499.20060702070602@mail.ru> <78904337.20060705215056@mail.ru> <2d3df92a0607080904j65e6faa8o8501246ad0e1191d@mail.gmail.com> <678456385.20060708232944@mail.ru> <2d3df92a0607081000q4e1436a3pd1712372a9060651@mail.gmail.com> <1565464009.20060709001700@mail.ru> X-Spam-Score: -2.1 (--) X-archive-position: 12001 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: exitconsole@gmail.com X-list: lojban-list X-Spam-Score: -2.1 (--) To: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-Originating-IP: 64.81.49.134 X-eGroups-Msg-Info: 1:0:0:0 X-eGroups-From: HeliodoR From: HeliodoR Reply-To: exitconsole@gmail.com Subject: [lojban] Re: Language-independent humor X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790; y=l5B87omX4MnRCBestymYeO4o0PyQfvYMk6yqCOcAGi5KZC9aPg X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 26428 ------=_Part_31328_5418433.1152383875763 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline > > I read the CLL 5:7 about {be} attachments. It wasn't mentioned there that > we can pull {be} in front of the selbri. I am not an expert in formal > grammars, but there we can find an answer to this point. > {pe} can also be nested. So why should {be} form an exception? > Jorge, what will you say? > It's not what he *will* say, it's about what he has said: I started to use nested {be}'s when I saw it in his letters. :) As well as the rafsi {nun} for event abstractions, and modals used as tenses, and... io sai mu'o ------=_Part_31328_5418433.1152383875763 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline

I read the CLL 5:7 about {be} attachments. It wasn't mentioned there that we can pull {be} in front of the selbri. I am not an expert in formal grammars, but there we can find an answer to this point.

{pe} can also be nested. So why should {be} form an exception?

Jorge, what will you say?

It's not what he *will* say, it's about what he has said: I started to use nested {be}'s when
I saw it in his letters. :) As well as the rafsi {nun} for event abstractions, and modals used
as tenses, and...
 
io sai mu'o
------=_Part_31328_5418433.1152383875763--