Return-Path: <lojban-out@lojban.org>
X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (qmail 45743 invoked from network); 8 Jul 2006 16:39:13 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217)
  by m32.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 8 Jul 2006 16:39:13 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.81.49.134)
  by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 8 Jul 2006 16:39:13 -0000
Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.62)
	(envelope-from <lojban-out@lojban.org>)
	id 1FzFmO-00040I-3q
	for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Sat, 08 Jul 2006 09:35:40 -0700
Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.49.134])
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62)
	(envelope-from <lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org>)
	id 1FzFlw-0003zp-OL; Sat, 08 Jul 2006 09:35:13 -0700
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sat, 08 Jul 2006 09:35:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.62)	(envelope-from <nobody@digitalkingdom.org>)	id 1FzFlW-0003zD-CV	for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Sat, 08 Jul 2006 09:34:46 -0700
Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.187])	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62)	(envelope-from <exitconsole@gmail.com>)	id 1FzFlV-0003z4-B8	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sat, 08 Jul 2006 09:34:46 -0700
Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id b2so206652nfe        for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Sat, 08 Jul 2006 09:34:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.78.97.7 with SMTP id u7mr1147864hub;        Sat, 08 Jul 2006 09:34:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.78.13.6 with HTTP; Sat, 8 Jul 2006 09:34:44 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <2d3df92a0607080934o7411e6efi151639c9e7d3c9e3@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 18:34:44 +0200
In-Reply-To: <6810593590.20060706212536@mail.ru>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_29813_20349260.1152376484015"
References: <6810593590.20060706212536@mail.ru>
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-archive-position: 11989
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: exitconsole@gmail.com
X-list: lojban-list
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
X-Originating-IP: 64.81.49.134
X-eGroups-Msg-Info: 1:0:0:0
X-eGroups-From: HeliodoR <exitconsole@gmail.com>
From: HeliodoR <lojban-out@lojban.org>
Reply-To: exitconsole@gmail.com
Subject: [lojban] Re: xalbebna
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790; y=vkRVNPekEwpmkoV0BtZ6odVnErLmET0vuE7pP4vUBk0QZlanYQ
X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out
X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 26415
Content-Length: 2815
Lines: 72

           
------=_Part_29813_20349260.1152376484015 
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

>
>  py. goi lo patfu ge'u joi by. goi lo bersa be py. cu zvati lo gusta
>
As far as I know {goi} doesn't work like this: it's put after the concrete
sumti
and followed by the assigned letteral. So: <sumti> goi BY.



>  B: .a'u doi patfu da jimpe lo du'u de xalbebna kei ta'i ma
>
You can express these rather metalinguistic B's and P's easily.
{by lu [bridi] li'u} is equivalent to "B: [bridi]".
Moreover, I think You meant {da jimpe lo du'u da xalbebna}, one realizes
that one is drunk.

>  P: xu do viska ta po'u re ninmu .i ganai ta simlu lo ka vomei ninmu kei
> da gi .e'e da xalbebna
>
{ta} (I may include an 'AFAIK' again) is normally used for objects near to
the
listener but the speaker not. {tu} is safer.

>  B: .iku'i .ue doi patfu ta du pa ninmu
>
:) u'i.
Why not use {pamei ninmu}?

mi'e darves
           
------=_Part_29813_20349260.1152376484015 
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">
<div>
<div>
<p>py. goi lo patfu ge'u joi by. goi lo bersa be py. cu zvati lo gusta</p></div></div></blockquote>
<div>As far as I know {goi} doesn't work like this: it's put after the&nbsp;concrete sumti</div>
<div>and followed by the assigned letteral. So: &lt;sumti&gt; goi BY.</div>
<div><br>&nbsp;</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">
<div>
<div>
<p>B: .a'u doi patfu da jimpe lo du'u de xalbebna kei ta'i ma</p></div></div></blockquote>
<div>You can express these&nbsp;rather metalinguistic B's and P's easily.</div>
<div>{by lu&nbsp;[bridi] li'u} is equivalent to &quot;B: [bridi]&quot;.</div>
<div>Moreover, I think You meant {da jimpe lo du'u da xalbebna}, one realizes</div>
<div>that one is drunk.</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">
<div>
<div>
<p>P: xu do viska ta po'u re ninmu .i ganai ta simlu lo ka vomei ninmu kei da gi .e'e da xalbebna</p></div></div></blockquote>
<div>{ta} (I may include an 'AFAIK' again) is&nbsp;normally used for objects near to the</div>
<div>listener but the speaker not. {tu} is safer.</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">
<div>
<div>
<p>B: .iku'i .ue doi patfu ta du pa ninmu</p></div></div></blockquote>
<div>:) u'i.</div>
<div>Why not use {pamei ninmu}?</div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div>mi'e darves</div>
           
------=_Part_29813_20349260.1152376484015--