From lojban-out@lojban.org Sun Jul 09 15:15:50 2006
Return-Path: <lojban-out@lojban.org>
X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (qmail 83447 invoked from network); 9 Jul 2006 22:13:14 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.167)
  by m26.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 9 Jul 2006 22:13:14 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.81.49.134)
  by mta6.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 9 Jul 2006 22:13:14 -0000
Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.62)
	(envelope-from <lojban-out@lojban.org>)
	id 1FzhWa-00083J-Hy
	for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Sun, 09 Jul 2006 15:13:12 -0700
Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.49.134])
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62)
	(envelope-from <lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org>)
	id 1FzhUb-0007wW-69; Sun, 09 Jul 2006 15:11:13 -0700
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sun, 09 Jul 2006 15:10:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.62)	(envelope-from <nobody@digitalkingdom.org>)	id 1FzhU8-0007wA-5y	for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Sun, 09 Jul 2006 15:10:40 -0700
Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.62)	(envelope-from <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>)	id 1FzhU7-0007w3-Sa	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sun, 09 Jul 2006 15:10:40 -0700
Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2006 15:10:39 -0700
Message-ID: <20060709221039.GI18983@chain.digitalkingdom.org>
Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org
References: <97397704.20060707223404@mail.ru> <20060707160659.GC11776@achatina.gabrielebner.at> <114580292.20060707232807@mail.ru> <2d3df92a0607081026n6427c8f2w326d7e8d470822fc@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <2d3df92a0607081026n6427c8f2w326d7e8d470822fc@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11+cvs20060403
X-archive-position: 12038
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
X-list: lojban-list
X-Spam-Score: -3.2 (---)
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
X-Originating-IP: 64.81.49.134
X-eGroups-Msg-Info: 1:0:0:0
X-eGroups-From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>
From: Robin Lee Powell <lojban-out@lojban.org>
Reply-To: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: [Anecdote #6] xabyterspe
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790; y=V-LMeRcCq4SxWN7VFsHlkc1Q05I5j1mS7Hews5fRrFmfmXQ2IA
X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out
X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 26465

On Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 07:26:59PM +0200, HeliodoR wrote:
> >
> > {ro prenu zo'u ...} is perfectly grammatical, and I don't see
> > any reasons
> >why adhere to strict logics in everyday speech.
> >
> >{ro broda zo'u brode} is a natural reduction of longer {ro da poi
> >broda zo'u da brode}.
> >
> "You have to leave out the {zo'u} here..." {ro prenu cu gonai
> terspe panzi gi nalterspe panzi} is what Gabriel meant.
> 
> By the way, aren't {speni panzi} and {xabyspe panzi} just as good
> as the flipped-around versions?

Probably.  He was looking for "marriage", which IMO is "nu speni".

-Robin

-- 
http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/
Reason #237 To Learn Lojban: "Homonyms: Their Grate!"
Proud Supporter of the Singularity Institute - http://singinst.org/


To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org
with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if
you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.