From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Sat Aug 12 20:01:52 2006 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sat, 12 Aug 2006 20:01:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1GC6EH-0001oW-4a for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Sat, 12 Aug 2006 20:01:33 -0700 Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.186]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1GC6EG-0001oP-An for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sat, 12 Aug 2006 20:01:33 -0700 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id a27so1327700nfc for ; Sat, 12 Aug 2006 20:01:30 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=rDTdUlAz3hKJn5w7mM9NPpisxev/OEWs/CXVS5YyO3DJJTuxlo12/m2ofgMAMPFZKgtoxnsdj0ExFxO6BhC0E/3jye22l39Gl76Ro72XZVRMhh0RIHyxfwoMVSwa9GQEEFe/bf5ant8v6IXiMlcxwpvQ9mXycM1ESIgVaCWsj0E= Received: by 10.78.185.7 with SMTP id i7mr2789771huf; Sat, 12 Aug 2006 20:01:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.159.4 with HTTP; Sat, 12 Aug 2006 20:01:30 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2006 22:01:30 -0500 From: "Matt Arnold" To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: bumru In-Reply-To: <1134315299.20060813094919@mail.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <1134315299.20060813094919@mail.ru> X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) X-archive-position: 12437 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: matt.mattarn@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On 8/12/06, Yanis Batura wrote: > On 13.08.2006, 8:19, Matt Arnold wrote: > > > "Liquid of which fog is composed" _is_ the fog > itself. It cannot _not_ > > > be fog. {tu se bumru} is precisely what is meant. > > > -epkat > > I thought x2 of bumru was intended to specify the type of the fog, since > there can be many different. > > mi'e .ianis. Yes, it can be used that way if someone chooses to specify. But even if they do that it's still saying there is a fog. Pointing and saying "look, that's a fog" and pointing and saying "look, that's a type of fog" is not an important difference. All types of fog are made of fog. All fogs are made of one or more of the types of fog. They cannot be two different things. -epkat To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.