From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Tue Aug 15 09:24:18 2006 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 15 Aug 2006 09:24:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1GD1hq-0001fQ-I6 for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Tue, 15 Aug 2006 09:23:54 -0700 Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.187]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1GD1ho-0001fI-DI for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 15 Aug 2006 09:23:54 -0700 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id x30so377433nfb for ; Tue, 15 Aug 2006 09:23:48 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=bHEhG/m+Yl1yyHnB6UV78g9ieK3mK/bYBDiK65RMJDHEzO58YNCWKj3DMcfbAHbmipZnul33Mnx3uIycIUMsTjAtbd6M7nufY4g6EmdVnWTE8ded3cTor+g6yilcJ6bl9xKcAVP5QMfCY10VA61rbOmq1qGmBWBEuiPAKG67it0= Received: by 10.49.41.12 with SMTP id t12mr1554048nfj; Tue, 15 Aug 2006 09:23:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.161.17 with HTTP; Tue, 15 Aug 2006 09:23:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 12:23:47 -0400 From: "Matt Arnold" To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: LojGloss update In-Reply-To: <737b61f30608150908r530f5ea6x96ecbeb838125178@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <737b61f30608150908r530f5ea6x96ecbeb838125178@mail.gmail.com> X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) X-archive-position: 12461 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: matt.mattarn@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On 8/15/06, Chris Capel wrote: > On 8/14/06, Yanis Batura wrote: > > This program is great! > > > > The one and only flaw I have noticed there is that it "recognizes" unpermissible lujvo like {rukgu'e} containing prohibited consonant clusters. > > I consciously decided when writing it not to do the invalid consonant > pair detection because (I was lazy and) I figured it would be better > to be more permissible and give what might be the intended gismu > rather than not giving anything. > > Chris Capel LojGloss is just getting more exciting as each day goes by. I recommend that if you do any further work on this issue, that the most LojGloss should do about prohibited consonant clusters is flag them to the user's attention. Please continue to give the user information about the meaning of the components of an impermissable word. A program that tells you what's wrong is more helpful than a program that demands input be perfect or it will choke silently. You made a good decision. -epkat To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.