From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Sat Aug 19 06:19:18 2006 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sat, 19 Aug 2006 06:19:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1GEQib-0006LR-1q for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Sat, 19 Aug 2006 06:18:38 -0700 Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.188]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1GEQiS-0006LE-ER for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sat, 19 Aug 2006 06:18:26 -0700 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id x30so1571859nfb for ; Sat, 19 Aug 2006 06:18:18 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=DAZV153ajfLgGNK/1l9Jv/ipMkc8vPgLxEUSPJEk/F78dr10lBS5x54fp/D6mM0PuJmzWdrjDJZantMg7KZbGMIAF87bNqWA18XZht4XywBnAoYGDjTe9iJbq4CkD/uHOJw2Sz7K9cvjWZBE6ij/SrFD+RDhYBPhf6zQAe3ZxT0= Received: by 10.48.254.10 with SMTP id b10mr5245156nfi; Sat, 19 Aug 2006 06:18:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.49.80.4 with HTTP; Sat, 19 Aug 2006 06:18:18 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <2d3df92a0608190618p5a77351fmd6d90d0001a2c4ba@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 15:18:18 +0200 From: HeliodoR To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: "berulium" In-Reply-To: <237341249.20060819153832@mail.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_10525_22270909.1155993498482" References: <237341249.20060819153832@mail.ru> X-Spam-Score: -2.2 (--) X-archive-position: 12498 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: exitconsole@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list ------=_Part_10525_22270909.1155993498482 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline > > I wonder whether {boronium}, {berulium} and {elium}} are valid after > {lo}. > They're names, so they cannot be. o_O I don't have any idea why Bobas used {lo}. mi'e.darves ------=_Part_10525_22270909.1155993498482 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline

I wonder whether {boronium}, {berulium} and {elium}} are valid after {lo}.

They're names, so they cannot be. o_O
I don't have any idea why Bobas used {lo}.
 
mi'e.darves
------=_Part_10525_22270909.1155993498482-- To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.