From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Tue Aug 22 06:17:24 2006 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 22 Aug 2006 09:36:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1GFW7s-0004wE-Kp for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 06:17:04 -0700 Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.189]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1GFW7p-0004vn-KJ for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 06:17:04 -0700 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id m19so61319nfc for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 06:17:00 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ltaTEKQSYLDlyKAGrEl1B/IYhUiW02JOComgiwlcNR56UYaEUmhOtKmQSRaXRov21z0/vaFlxlOCdGme8inAcZO7j5nYAJ31SjnoxkdoqHSbRb/HcJH9AdLIIw9+KxHY6qZsT9L+WRGXbsZlHa/iNaBkVynnFkWNSfNKh4g1e80= Received: by 10.49.8.4 with SMTP id l4mr408364nfi; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 06:16:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.48.208.16 with HTTP; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 06:16:59 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 15:16:59 +0200 From: "Gregory Dyke" To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: Puzzle In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) X-archive-position: 12544 X-Approved-By: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: gregdyke@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list I have no problem with the 2nd. It is less precise than the first, but works. Although I can't remember what happens to sumti in _je_ joinings. I (read and write) something. Maybe mi ka'e tcidu gi'e ciska is closer? Greg On 8/22/06, Yanis Batura wrote: > "I can read and write" is translated to Lojban as > > (1) mi kakne lo nu tcidu kei .e lo nu ciska > > The more intuitive version, > > (2) mi ka'e tcidu je ciska > > is wrong. What does it mean? > > > To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org > with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if > you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help. > > To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.