From lojban-out@lojban.org Tue Aug 01 21:42:37 2006
Return-Path: <lojban-out@lojban.org>
X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (qmail 56543 invoked from network); 2 Aug 2006 04:42:34 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.167)
  by m34.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 2 Aug 2006 04:42:34 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.81.49.134)
  by mta6.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 2 Aug 2006 04:42:34 -0000
Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.62)
	(envelope-from <lojban-out@lojban.org>)
	id 1G88Yy-0007qG-G1
	for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Tue, 01 Aug 2006 21:42:32 -0700
Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.49.134])
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62)
	(envelope-from <lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org>)
	id 1G88Xe-0007ml-R1; Tue, 01 Aug 2006 21:41:13 -0700
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 01 Aug 2006 21:41:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.62)	(envelope-from <nobody@digitalkingdom.org>)	id 1G88XC-0007mM-II	for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Tue, 01 Aug 2006 21:40:42 -0700
Received: from phma.optus.nu ([166.82.175.165] helo=ixazon.dynip.com)	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62)	(envelope-from <phma@phma.optus.nu>)	id 1G88XB-0007mA-CL	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 01 Aug 2006 21:40:42 -0700
Received: from [192.168.25.19] (unknown [192.168.25.19])	by ixazon.dynip.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A856CE675	for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Wed,  2 Aug 2006 00:40:27 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 00:39:55 -0400
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1
References: <737b61f30607312013v643cfe8ah5c71366b74a0e322@mail.gmail.com> <737b61f30608011602r5af5b8b7s87d1ce45ca98955e@mail.gmail.com> <12d58c160608011629m31adcfafuf3299e49bc97e385@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <12d58c160608011629m31adcfafuf3299e49bc97e385@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200608020039.57947.phma@phma.optus.nu>
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
X-archive-position: 12300
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: phma@phma.optus.nu
X-list: lojban-list
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
X-Originating-IP: 64.81.49.134
X-eGroups-Msg-Info: 1:0:0:0
X-eGroups-From: Pierre Abbat <phma@phma.optus.nu>
From: Pierre Abbat <lojban-out@lojban.org>
Reply-To: phma@phma.optus.nu
Subject: [lojban] Re: bo, i, and ni'o
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790; y=hb90qesbQ-hqVx4FUEOkO9D88yXNWKcaBXHKIS91lcsBe4dryQ
X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out
X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 26728

On Tuesday 01 August 2006 19:29, Adam COOPER wrote:
> After running into this problem a few times, I concluded that {bo} is a
> connector dependent on the previous statement. Two statements connected by
> a {bo} are kind of like a single sentence. E.g.
>
> mi pensi i se ni'i bo mi zasti
> I think, therefore I am.
>
> So the dependence requires the {.i} which at least implies a previous
> statement, & precludes the {ni'o} because a sentence can't spill over into
> a new paragraph.

So why can't we connect two paragraphs with {bazibo}?

phma


To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org
with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if
you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.