From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Sun Sep 24 23:07:29 2006 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sun, 24 Sep 2006 23:07:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1GRjcT-00062Y-4A for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 23:07:09 -0700 Received: from py-out-1112.google.com ([64.233.166.179]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1GRjcR-00062P-CC for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 23:07:08 -0700 Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id i49so2000389pyi for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 23:07:06 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:to:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; b=nu5zTOrFd7PodZWIxhdZ0SMx3OqVQwdhkLiccF/dKW3Zy4uFFTG+sSS8rJJvHOV7ZbyqwawzpBFaZuuDOJWlR/HUzF9CRl+u6ehKz1Bc+y0EFCOESCrQWKpLbwdmgpZhqJ/2owJXMVCwxzAXWRJelz0v+FyYa8mMTgpKn6g0Bdw= Received: by 10.35.39.13 with SMTP id r13mr7611695pyj; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 23:07:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ( [71.112.110.242]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id n62sm2492157pyf.2006.09.24.23.07.05; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 23:07:06 -0700 (PDT) From: Timothy Hobbs To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: my opinion on why lojban isn't specifically well suited for human-computer interaction.1 References: <45176eec.2230f5f7.212f.ffffab6c@mx.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 23:07:04 -0700 In-Reply-To: <45176eec.2230f5f7.212f.ffffab6c@mx.gmail.com> (M.'s message of "Sun\, 24 Sep 2006 23\:54\:58 -0600") Message-ID: <87slig32ev.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-archive-position: 12625 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: tim.thelion@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list if all Spanish words were regularly modified Latin words, instead of just most. would Spanish not be a language but a code. does the fact that Spanish imports a class libraries of words from 3rd party languages (that is, other than Latin...) make it a language and not an code for speaking Latin? would that make Morse code come under the same category as Spanish, since it has its own unique set of acronyms and words related to communicating accurately? To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.