From lojban-out@lojban.org Mon Sep 25 04:42:29 2006 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 42789 invoked from network); 25 Sep 2006 11:41:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m30.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 25 Sep 2006 11:41:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.81.49.134) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 25 Sep 2006 11:41:37 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1GRopl-0006yn-RV for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 04:41:17 -0700 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.49.134]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1GRood-0006xO-Cx; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 04:40:11 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 25 Sep 2006 04:39:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1GRomw-0006vJ-9m for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 04:38:26 -0700 Received: from imo-m21.mx.aol.com ([64.12.137.2]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1GRomW-0006uu-PA for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 04:38:04 -0700 Received: from MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com by imo-m21.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r7.6.) id d.c47.3c1cadd (62952) for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 07:37:47 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 07:37:47 EDT MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_c47.3c1cadd.3249198b_boundary" X-Mailer: 6.0 for Windows XP sub 11501 X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-archive-position: 12630 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com X-list: lojban-list X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) To: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-Originating-IP: 64.81.49.134 X-eGroups-From: MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com From: lojban-out@lojban.org Reply-To: MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com Subject: [lojban] binary vs. digital X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790; y=O9kqCc6oQvqL3_i6qEv4QkHp7SnADvFINYYMMO7I7u48I6RKNw X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 27064 --part1_c47.3c1cadd.3249198b_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 9/25/2006 4:22:37 AM Central Standard Time, ecartis@digitalkingdom.org writes: > From: "M@" > Subject: [lojban] my opinion on why lojban isn't specifically well suited > for h > Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 09:24:17 -0600 > > ... > Computers are both digital and binary (note: I distinguish digital from > binary, some people disagree, but that's another argument altogether (and > yes I'm aware that binary implies digital, that phrase is foreshadowing)), > What distinction are you making between binary and digital? stevo --part1_c47.3c1cadd.3249198b_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In a message dated 9/25/2006 4:22:37 AM Ce= ntral Standard Time, ecartis@digitalkingdom.org writes:


From: "M@" <matthew.du= nlap@gmail.com>
Subject: [lojban] my opinion on why lojban isn't specifically well suit= ed for h
Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 09:24:17 -0600

...
Computers are both digital and binary (note: I distinguish digital from
binary, some people disagree, but that's another argument altogether (a= nd
yes I'm aware that binary implies digital, that phrase is foreshadowing= )),


What distinction are you making between binary and digital?  

stevo --part1_c47.3c1cadd.3249198b_boundary--