From lojban-out@lojban.org Mon Sep 25 04:39:11 2006 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 91502 invoked from network); 25 Sep 2006 11:30:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.67.36) by m30.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 25 Sep 2006 11:30:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.81.49.134) by mta10.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 25 Sep 2006 11:30:02 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1GRoeJ-0006oL-Gg for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 04:29:28 -0700 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.49.134]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1GRoaa-0006lx-K6; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 04:25:41 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 25 Sep 2006 04:25:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1GRoZs-0006lX-CM for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 04:24:51 -0700 Received: from imo-m27.mx.aol.com ([64.12.137.8]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1GRoZh-0006lK-Rx for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 04:24:45 -0700 Received: from MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com by imo-m27.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r7.6.) id d.4f5.5c29791 (62952) for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 07:24:35 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4f5.5c29791.32491673@wmconnect.com> Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 07:24:35 EDT MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_4f5.5c29791.32491673_boundary" X-Mailer: 6.0 for Windows XP sub 11501 X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) X-archive-position: 12629 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com X-list: lojban-list X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) To: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-Originating-IP: 64.81.49.134 X-eGroups-From: MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com From: lojban-out@lojban.org Reply-To: MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com Subject: [lojban] bash? X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790; y=7KDwnZK4FibYIBhqNOkDVKwBZ4iRrCyMLH0hi3qa-zDxFP3pBQ X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 27063 --part1_4f5.5c29791.32491673_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 9/25/2006 4:22:37 AM Central Standard Time, ecartis@digitalkingdom.org writes: > The problem I have with this goal is that it's a solution to a problem that > has been solved for decades. There are many SULs that are already written > and in use as computer interfaces across the world. My personal favorite is > bash. To compare bash to lojban I would say that bash is easier to learn > (it is much smaller after all) and every bit as versatile as a > cross-programming-language interaction framework as lojban could possibly be > in a classical computing environment. What's bash? stevo --part1_4f5.5c29791.32491673_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In a message dated 9/25/2006 4:22:37 AM Ce= ntral Standard Time, ecartis@digitalkingdom.org writes:


The problem I have with t= his goal is that it's a solution to a problem that
has been solved for decades.  There are many SULs that are already= written
and in use as computer interfaces across the world.  My personal f= avorite is
bash.  To compare bash to lojban I would say that bash is easier t= o learn
(it is much smaller after all) and every bit as versatile as a
cross-programming-language interaction framework as lojban could possib= ly be
in a classical computing environment.  
What's bash?

stevo --part1_4f5.5c29791.32491673_boundary--