From lojban-out@lojban.org Tue Oct 31 18:45:03 2006 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 89965 invoked from network); 1 Nov 2006 02:37:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.166) by m22.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 1 Nov 2006 02:37:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.81.49.134) by mta5.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 1 Nov 2006 02:37:59 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Gf5uk-0001VX-WF for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Tue, 31 Oct 2006 18:33:15 -0800 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.49.134]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Gf5tU-0001Ul-Oi; Tue, 31 Oct 2006 18:32:00 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 31 Oct 2006 18:31:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Gf5t2-0001Ua-0q for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Tue, 31 Oct 2006 18:31:28 -0800 Received: from centrmmtai06.cox.net ([70.168.83.88]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Gf5sy-0001UR-CQ for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 31 Oct 2006 18:31:27 -0800 Received: from eastrmimpo01.cox.net ([68.1.16.119]) by centrmmtao06.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.06.03 201-2131-130-104-20060516) with ESMTP id <20061101023124.KJJR14538.centrmmtao06.cox.net@eastrmimpo01.cox.net> for ; Tue, 31 Oct 2006 21:31:24 -0500 Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([72.192.234.183]) by eastrmimpo01.cox.net with bizsmtp id hEWo1V00o3y5FKc0000000 Tue, 31 Oct 2006 21:30:51 -0500 Message-ID: <454806F7.8020605@lojban.org> Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 21:31:19 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <908874857.20061101055928@mail.ru> In-Reply-To: <908874857.20061101055928@mail.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-archive-position: 12879 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: lojbab@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) To: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-Originating-IP: 64.81.49.134 X-eGroups-Msg-Info: 1:0:0:0 X-eGroups-From: Bob LeChevalier From: Bob LeChevalier Reply-To: lojbab@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: New Artwork For Lojban? X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790; y=_CQE9x6f7RkCMxhzSZMX5994T9o3ZaB8DyIKR0Xjtum9FcJE-A X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 27319 Yanis Batura wrote: > Matt's logo doesn't suffer from {le cimei}. > > Is the logo baselined as the language itself? The logo was adopted by a vote of the community back around 1989 or 1990. Thus some on the LLG Board of Directors felt that we would be obliged to seek some sort of a community vote before considering any sort of change to and alternative or plural set of logos/symbols. lojbab To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.