Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 9616 invoked from network); 1 Oct 2006 22:29:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.67.35) by m21.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 1 Oct 2006 22:29:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.81.49.134) by mta9.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 1 Oct 2006 22:29:57 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1GU9Bg-0007mu-Np for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Sun, 01 Oct 2006 14:49:28 -0700 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.49.134]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1GU9BB-0007mC-Hb; Sun, 01 Oct 2006 14:48:59 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sun, 01 Oct 2006 14:48:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1GU9Aj-0007lm-UA for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Sun, 01 Oct 2006 14:48:30 -0700 Received: from phma.optus.nu ([166.82.175.165] helo=ixazon.dynip.com) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1GU9Ac-0007lM-Vj for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sun, 01 Oct 2006 14:48:29 -0700 Received: from [192.168.25.19] (unknown [192.168.25.19]) by ixazon.dynip.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3539CE2BC for ; Sun, 1 Oct 2006 17:48:09 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2006 17:48:04 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <411a52d90610011426p43a359cfqe452abffd2da4aed@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <411a52d90610011426p43a359cfqe452abffd2da4aed@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200610011748.05593.phma@phma.optus.nu> X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) X-archive-position: 12666 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: phma@phma.optus.nu X-list: lojban-list X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) To: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-Originating-IP: 64.81.49.134 X-eGroups-Msg-Info: 1:0:0:0 X-eGroups-From: Pierre Abbat From: Pierre Abbat Reply-To: phma@phma.optus.nu Subject: [lojban] Re: everyday lojban X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790; y=y-ehsPVH7lgk4QEtz1wTDF6fT_ANDBPgQA2ZxiTFhRGeTDnK5g X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 27101 Content-Length: 710 Lines: 20 On Sunday 01 October 2006 17:26, Hans Isbrücker wrote: > So rafsi on there own are permitted? No. {pei} is a cmavo, which happens to resemble the rafsi of {pensi}. Similarly {gau}, {bau}, and several others. But {poi} is a relative conjunction, not the preposition corresponding to {porsi}, which is {po'i}, which sounds like the rafsi for {porpi}. And {mupli} has two cmavo in different selma'o: {mu'a}, a discursive, and {mu'u}, a preposition; and no CVV rafsi. Pierre To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.