From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Wed Nov 01 10:56:33 2006 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 01 Nov 2006 10:56:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1GfLG3-0000pO-Ca for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Wed, 01 Nov 2006 10:56:15 -0800 Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com ([66.249.82.236]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1GfLFw-0000pE-AT for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 01 Nov 2006 10:56:15 -0800 Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id r21so2831116wxc for ; Wed, 01 Nov 2006 10:56:06 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=lDRhJK9RYoiMofJb+eZO/1z0Nma0qZw1LixKpJ1zGLvKK8/XgdgvcDQXX6v/qNzumupzJKI6xReiSWB7oHacbS7Ho2i60jIC+7Xbq3YVDW4Loe6aOVA3a2h6OYQBlTCNXpbFIi4Fc3oVY9uskSoysJMyZ6cMExLkXF/QfkzK+bg= Received: by 10.78.127.2 with SMTP id z2mr138937huc; Wed, 01 Nov 2006 10:56:04 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.124.16 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Nov 2006 10:56:04 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 13:56:04 -0500 From: "Andrii (lOkadin) Zvorygin" To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: unnecessary capitalized vowels In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_23696_17990235.1162407364277" References: X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--) X-archive-position: 12891 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: andrii.z@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list ------=_Part_23696_17990235.1162407364277 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline .u'u I should never have mentioned the fact I capitalize the penultimate syllable. Would you have cared had I not made a post about it? Really is my fault. On 11/1/06, MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com wrote: > > In a message dated 11/1/2006 4:22:15 AM Central Standard Time, > ecartis@digitalkingdom.org writes: > > > From: "Andrii (lOkadin) Zvorygin" > Subject: [lojban] Re: reform > > Thank you for pointing out the fa fi, inconsitancy. > I'm for removing words, but Not for narrowing the vocabulary. > It's just we have a lot of words, that are just insulting, like cultural > gIsmu. What about the Hungarians? > > On 10/31/06, HeliodoR wrote: > > > > > removal of ambiguous gIsmu [...] > > > > What's the point in removing words and narrowing the vocabulary? > > > > I'm for removing words, but Not for narrowing the vocabulary. > It's just we have a lot of words, that are just insulting, like cultural > gIsmu. What about the Hungarians? > It's not going to narrow your vocabulary to take out synonyms like lOjbo, > we > already have la lOjban. no point in having a cultural gIsmu too. Take the > > example of sOfto. English doesn't have a verb for every nationality, and I > > think you'd be hard pressed to find a language with such an odd concept. > > > > lOkadin, > When you stop capitalizing vowels unnecessarily, I'll start reading your > posts again. > > stevo -- ta'o(by the way) We With You Network at: http://lokiworld.org .i(and) more on Lojban: http://lojban.org mu'oimi'e lOkadin (Over, my name is lOkadin) ------=_Part_23696_17990235.1162407364277 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline .u'u I should never have mentioned the fact I capitalize the penultimate syllable. Would you have cared had I not made a post about it? Really is my fault.

On 11/1/06, MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com <MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com> wrote:
In a message dated 11/1/2006 4:22:15 AM Central Standard Time, ecartis@digitalkingdom.org writes:


From: "Andrii (lOkadin) Zvorygin" < andrii.z@gmail.com>
Subject: [lojban] Re: reform

Thank you for pointing out the fa fi, inconsitancy.
I'm for removing words, but Not for narrowing the vocabulary.
It's just we have a lot of words, that are just insulting, like cultural
gIsmu. What about the Hungarians?

On 10/31/06, HeliodoR <exitconsole@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > removal of ambiguous gIsmu [...]
>
> What's the point in removing words and narrowing the vocabulary?
>

I'm for removing words, but Not for narrowing the vocabulary.
It's just we have a lot of words, that are just insulting, like cultural
gIsmu. What about the Hungarians?
It's not going to narrow your vocabulary to take out synonyms like lOjbo, we
already have la lOjban. no point in having a cultural gIsmu too.  Take the
example of sOfto. English doesn't have a verb for every nationality, and I
think you'd be hard pressed to find a language with such an odd concept.



lOkadin,
When you stop capitalizing vowels unnecessarily, I'll start reading your posts again.  

stevo



--
ta'o(by the way)  We With You Network at: http://lokiworld.org .i(and)
more on Lojban: http://lojban.org
mu'oimi'e lOkadin (Over, my name is lOkadin) ------=_Part_23696_17990235.1162407364277-- To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.