From lojban-out@lojban.org Mon Nov 13 19:34:12 2006 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 94718 invoked from network); 14 Nov 2006 03:27:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m36.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 14 Nov 2006 03:27:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.81.49.134) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 14 Nov 2006 03:27:48 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Gjomz-0000AW-Jh for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Mon, 13 Nov 2006 19:16:45 -0800 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.49.134]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Gjokg-00008o-DD; Mon, 13 Nov 2006 19:14:27 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 13 Nov 2006 19:14:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1GjokD-00008W-Vn for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Mon, 13 Nov 2006 19:13:54 -0800 Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.187]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Gjok8-00008N-I5 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 13 Nov 2006 19:13:53 -0800 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id c31so215178nfb for ; Mon, 13 Nov 2006 19:13:47 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.49.8.15 with SMTP id l15mr476103nfi.1163474027124; Mon, 13 Nov 2006 19:13:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.2.3? ( [80.192.159.177]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id h1sm793559nfe.2006.11.13.19.13.46; Mon, 13 Nov 2006 19:13:47 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <45593468.4090504@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 03:13:44 +0000 User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20061113204805.48815.qmail@web81309.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <4558E466.80006@lojban.org> <525A773F-A307-43AF-9603-3E18C02C42FA@mac.com> <20061113222348.GL24729@chain.digitalkingdom.org> <54928D3C-975A-48ED-BBCB-2FEE8811049C@mac.com> <20061114004132.GR24729@chain.digitalkingdom.org> <45592027.80507@lojban.org> In-Reply-To: <45592027.80507@lojban.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-archive-position: 13154 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: and.rosta@gmail.com X-list: lojban-list X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) To: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-Originating-IP: 64.81.49.134 X-eGroups-From: And Rosta From: And Rosta Reply-To: and.rosta@gmail.com Subject: [lojban] Re: "la" rule X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790; y=HqgvHWEw4Db2t3dVPFO1M12-9WB4Sckw3iwHh2J7_gzdjmv9cA X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 27588 I'm a bit mystified as to why this is provoking such debate and such arcane workarounds. Is it not the case that Mark years ago proposed changing the phonemic composition of {la, lai, doi} to {la., lai., doi.}? That change is simple and linguistically unproblematic, so the BPFK has a simple choice between introducing it or sticking with the current prescription. --And. To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.