From lojban-out@lojban.org Thu Nov 09 23:25:53 2006 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 18615 invoked from network); 10 Nov 2006 07:22:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.67.33) by m36.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 10 Nov 2006 07:22:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.81.49.134) by mta7.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 10 Nov 2006 07:22:04 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1GiQel-0007Yl-Ol for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Thu, 09 Nov 2006 23:18:31 -0800 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.49.134]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1GiQe2-0007YB-PR; Thu, 09 Nov 2006 23:17:51 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Thu, 09 Nov 2006 23:17:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1GiQdb-0007Xn-KZ for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Thu, 09 Nov 2006 23:17:19 -0800 Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.170]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1GiQdW-0007XZ-Rn for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 09 Nov 2006 23:17:19 -0800 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id c2so427201ugf for ; Thu, 09 Nov 2006 23:17:13 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.67.101.10 with SMTP id d10mr2868320ugm.1163143033209; Thu, 09 Nov 2006 23:17:13 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.66.216.14 with HTTP; Thu, 9 Nov 2006 23:17:13 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 02:17:13 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20061110061200.GF23121@chain.digitalkingdom.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_33243_21225425.1163143033065" References: <200611081049.40483.colin.wright@denbridgemarine.com> <45533464.7080901@lojban.org> <4553A799.5010907@lojban.org> <20061110061200.GF23121@chain.digitalkingdom.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.1 (--) X-archive-position: 13033 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: hobyrne@gmail.com X-list: lojban-list X-Spam-Score: -2.1 (--) To: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-Originating-IP: 64.81.49.134 X-eGroups-From: "Hugh O'Byrne" From: "Hugh O'Byrne" Reply-To: hobyrne@gmail.com Subject: [lojban] Re: livejournal discrimination X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790; y=5ibp2wRaubCJjAVFVoz7z89VtG8i3T31gy6EvDY-ByyGTvgi8Q X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 27471 ------=_Part_33243_21225425.1163143033065 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline On 11/10/06, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 09, 2006 at 09:27:09PM -0500, Hugh O'Byrne wrote: > > On 11/9/06, Bob LeChevalier wrote: > > >If my expressions get people so pissed off at me that they don't > > >want to talk about LOkadin any more, then my purposes will be > > >served. > > > > There you have it, from the horse's mouth, folks. Bob will > > disregard the rules of the language, he will even disregard the > > welfare of this community, just so that he can have his way. > > He said *about*, not *to*. I know that's what he said. The welfare of the community I referred to is not 'being on speaking terms with LOkadin', but 'accomodating polite debate even in the face of differing individuals' opinions'. He wants the lokadin discussion to end > because it's pointless, that's all. That's *not* what he said. He wants the discussion to end because the discussion doesn't serve his purposes. mi'e .xius. -- Good night, and have a rational tomorrow! ------=_Part_33243_21225425.1163143033065 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline On 11/10/06, Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org> wrote:
On Thu, Nov 09, 2006 at 09:27:09PM -0500, Hugh O'Byrne wrote:
> On 11/9/06, Bob LeChevalier <lojbab@lojban.org > wrote:
> >If my expressions get people so pissed off at me that they don't
> >want to talk about LOkadin any more, then my purposes will be
> >served.
>
> There you have it, from the horse's mouth, folks.  Bob will
> disregard the rules of the language, he will even disregard the
> welfare of this community, just so that he can have his way.

He said *about*, not *to*.

I know that's what he said.  The welfare of the community I referred to is not 'being on speaking terms with LOkadin', but 'accomodating polite debate even in the face of differing individuals' opinions'.

  He wants the lokadin discussion to end
because it's pointless, that's all.

That's *not* what he said.  He wants the discussion to end because the discussion doesn't serve his purposes.

mi'e .xius.
--
Good night, and have a rational tomorrow!

------=_Part_33243_21225425.1163143033065--