From lojban-out@lojban.org Tue Nov 21 06:32:00 2006 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 55271 invoked from network); 21 Nov 2006 14:31:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.167) by m36.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 21 Nov 2006 14:31:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.81.66.169) by mta6.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 21 Nov 2006 14:31:15 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1GmWeU-0004fK-Rc for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 06:31:11 -0800 Received: from dsl081-066-169.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([64.81.66.169] helo=chain.digitalkingdom.org) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1GmWdv-0004eP-83; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 06:30:43 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 21 Nov 2006 06:30:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1GmWdQ-0004eA-Vh for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 06:30:05 -0800 Received: from sabre-wulf.nvg.ntnu.no ([129.241.210.67]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1GmWdK-0004dh-HQ for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 06:30:04 -0800 Received: from hagbart.nvg.ntnu.no (hagbart.nvg.ntnu.no [129.241.210.68]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sabre-wulf.nvg.ntnu.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 419E094790 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 15:29:38 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 15:29:38 +0100 (CET) X-X-Sender: arj@hagbart.nvg.ntnu.no In-Reply-To: <456226FC.3030801@lojban.org> Message-ID: References: <492596e80611182014o7608f9d3k76f7247f5926b98b@mail.gmail.com> <1df90d2b0611182026yeb05a5eo95f815883cb20fd@mail.gmail.com> <836504149.20061119104734@mail.ru> <4560FB73.5060706@lojban.org> <925d17560611201204l6a6b59dbuece7d7cb70a06e6b@mail.gmail.com> <456226FC.3030801@lojban.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-NVG-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-NVG-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: arj@nvg.org X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-archive-position: 13234 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: arj@nvg.org X-list: lojban-list X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) To: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-Originating-IP: 64.81.66.169 X-eGroups-From: Arnt Richard Johansen From: Arnt Richard Johansen Reply-To: arj@nvg.org Subject: [lojban] Jbovlaste (was: Re: Re: ki'a) X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790; y=Wr0BLdJNAzUTqTQADFC-EQmxQSeCvCV4fyTZMjs5H1fKxgLrYw X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 27669 On Mon, 20 Nov 2006, Bob LeChevalier wrote: > jbovlaste remains unofficial, I understand what you are saying, but for anyone who are not familiar with the subtleties, I think I should clarify: * Jbovlaste-the-project is an officially sanctioned project of the LLG. * Jbovlaste-the-database contains data from multiple sources: the baselined gismu and cmavo lists (official), the pre-jbovlaste lujvo list compiled by Nora (unofficial, but imbued with some authority), lujvo and fu'ivla added by jbovlaste editors (unofficial), experimental cmavo added by jbovlaste editors (unofficial, and will probably never be recognised in their current form), and experimental gismu added by the editors (rampantly unofficial, and will probably never ever be made official). * Jbovlaste-the-database is intended to, at one point in the future after the completion of the BPFK, be edited down to constitute a printed dictionary with only officially-sanctioned entries. > and in any event there is little reason to suspect that an arbitrary > unfamiliar fu'ivla would be found therein. In my experience, Jbovlaste is turning into a quite mature resource. When encountering an unfamiliar fu'ivla in writing, I usually check Jbovlaste first, with good hopes of turning up an entry. This is ESPECIALLY true if the fu'ivla is a type IV, because it takes more effort to construct such words, and they are therefore more likely to be documented. -- Arnt Richard Johansen http://arj.nvg.org/ "My speech recognition software may have trouble with ordinary words, but not with ketoprofen." --Magnus Itland To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.