From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Wed Dec 06 21:04:28 2006 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 06 Dec 2006 21:04:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1GsBQU-0007jc-Av for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Wed, 06 Dec 2006 21:04:06 -0800 Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.188]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1GsBQL-0007jF-Ep for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 06 Dec 2006 21:04:03 -0800 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id c31so1377445nfb for ; Wed, 06 Dec 2006 21:03:56 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=Zedi/oKDWPndVqlng/6hUlJH4yJfrFlXutbm53nn12Unla04Gvv6s0ynYyHNS15Njdw+Sg1mWixhv8ZzmauI2t/Q3DCj8WtfM+HWGaI5Z8X/JIehEHZMckeqyMbsQesfIEl40U6XVpWTQ9VqJwcDKtfVJaMAl9oGIZ5dC5eI9bA= Received: by 10.49.64.17 with SMTP id r17mr3257139nfk.1165467836040; Wed, 06 Dec 2006 21:03:56 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.49.23.10 with HTTP; Wed, 6 Dec 2006 21:03:56 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <492596e80612062103t644ba60dt557b368aaa810d8@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 13:03:56 +0800 From: "Wang Xuerui" To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: Paradoxes In-Reply-To: <12d58c160612061058u574121b8wc83a06a6281b13b1@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_119609_9188867.1165467836009" References: <492596e80612052122k3be6a513ie63fbb2aaf0e3b3b@mail.gmail.com> <12d58c160612061058u574121b8wc83a06a6281b13b1@mail.gmail.com> X-Spam-Score: -2.2 (--) X-archive-position: 13319 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: idontknw.wang@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list ------=_Part_119609_9188867.1165467836009 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline 2006/12/7, komfo,amonan : > > On 12/6/06, Wang Xuerui wrote: > > > > > By the way, who knows paradoxes shorter than {la'e dei jitfa}? > > > > > > mi'e .ianis > > > > If you're asking for something which has fewer syllables (the original > > one has 5), I'd say {danaduda}, 4 syllables. > > > > Am I right? > > > I believe that {da na du da} is not a paradox, but simply false. mu'o mi'e > komfo,amonan > > > Oh yes, shame on me. I think I should review my logic books again. Then who'd be able to find a paradox that meets the original requirements? -- Come and see http://community.livejournal.com/lojban/ -- The Lojban Community. mi ma srera -- Anything wrong? .imu'omi'e .uang. to mi na'e nelci la .uan. toi Over, I'm Wang (I don't like Wan) ------=_Part_119609_9188867.1165467836009 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline

2006/12/7, komfo,amonan <komfoamonan@gmail.com>:
On 12/6/06, Wang Xuerui <idontknw.wang@gmail.com> wrote:
> By the way, who knows paradoxes shorter than {la'e dei jitfa}?
>
> mi'e .ianis

If you're asking for something which has fewer syllables (the original one has 5), I'd say {danaduda}, 4 syllables.

Am I right?

I believe that {da na du da} is not a paradox, but simply false. mu'o mi'e komfo,amonan



Oh yes, shame on me. I think I should review my logic books again.

Then who'd be able to find a paradox that meets the original requirements?

--
Come and see http://community.livejournal.com/lojban/ -- The Lojban Community.

mi ma srera -- Anything wrong?

.imu'omi'e .uang. to mi na'e nelci la .uan. toi
Over, I'm Wang (I don't like Wan) ------=_Part_119609_9188867.1165467836009-- To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.