From lojban-out@lojban.org Sun Dec 03 05:07:29 2006 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 58144 invoked from network); 3 Dec 2006 13:01:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.166) by m24.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 3 Dec 2006 13:01:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.81.66.169) by mta5.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 3 Dec 2006 13:01:58 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Gqqus-0004b5-L8 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Sun, 03 Dec 2006 04:58:02 -0800 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.66.169]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Gqqrf-0008TF-Ga; Sun, 03 Dec 2006 04:55:04 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sun, 03 Dec 2006 04:54:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1GqqqU-0008SN-QW for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Sun, 03 Dec 2006 04:53:29 -0800 Received: from imo-d22.mx.aol.com ([205.188.144.208]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1GqqqN-0008SB-0D for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sun, 03 Dec 2006 04:53:23 -0800 Received: from MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com by imo-d22.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r7.6.) id d.9e.5ecdc7cb (32913) for ; Sun, 3 Dec 2006 07:53:09 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <9e.5ecdc7cb.32a422b3@wmconnect.com> Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 07:53:07 EST MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_9e.5ecdc7cb.32a422b3_boundary" X-Mailer: 6.0 for Windows XP sub 11501 X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.4 (/) X-archive-position: 13296 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com X-list: lojban-list X-Spam-Score: -1.1 (-) To: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-Originating-IP: 64.81.66.169 X-eGroups-Msg-Info: 1:0:0:0 X-eGroups-From: MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com From: lojban-out@lojban.org Reply-To: MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com Subject: [lojban] sign language in Lojban X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790; y=N77BK046R3BpDhr35vccNk6rq8pOFoTAKURar5BgEMKr2GLv5w X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 27734 --part1_9e.5ecdc7cb.32a422b3_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 12/3/2006 4:22:19 AM Central Standard Time, lojbab via ecartis@digitalkingdom.org writes: > The real test might be if someone tries to express all of the features > and assumptions of sign language into Lojban. This was something that > came up once (I'm assuming it wasn't you - the person, whose name I > can't remember, but s/he was especially interested written > transcriptions of sign language, I think based on choreography notation > - seemed to think Lojban could meet the challenge, if in no other way by > coming up with verbal representations of written sign language). You > may be in a better position to evaluate, having examined sign language > linguistically. > If anyone knows about this, please post it. I'm very interested in both writing sign languages and signing spoken languages. stevo --part1_9e.5ecdc7cb.32a422b3_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In a message dated 12/3/2006 4:22:19 AM Ce= ntral Standard Time, lojbab via ecartis@digitalkingdom.org writes:


The real test might be if= someone tries to express all of the features=20
and assumptions of sign language into Lojban.  This was something = that=20
came up once (I'm assuming it wasn't you - the person, whose name I=20
can't remember, but s/he was especially interested written=20
transcriptions of sign language, I think based on choreography notation= =20
- seemed to think Lojban could meet the challenge, if in no other way b= y=20
coming up with verbal representations of written sign language).  = You=20
may be in a better position to evaluate, having examined sign language= =20
linguistically.


If anyone knows about this, please post it.  I'm very interested i= n both writing sign languages and signing spoken languages.

stevo --part1_9e.5ecdc7cb.32a422b3_boundary--