From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Wed Jan 03 07:18:45 2007 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 03 Jan 2007 07:18:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1H27sg-0001BH-8D for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Wed, 03 Jan 2007 07:18:25 -0800 Received: from anno.name ([81.169.186.62] helo=mail.anno.name ident=postfix) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1H27sP-0001A6-5v for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 03 Jan 2007 07:18:14 -0800 Received: from [192.168.1.146] (p5085CB71.dip.t-dialin.net [80.133.203.113]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.anno.name (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CF8D6ABB3 for ; Wed, 3 Jan 2007 16:17:38 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <459BC8F6.7010009@perpetuum-immobile.de> Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2007 16:17:10 +0100 From: Timo Paulssen User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20061222) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: Military language References: <000c01c72ee9$d72544b0$6601a8c0@hq.squarei.net> <459BC0B2.3090803@ropine.com> <925d17560701030655ia74c764x43fa0448381c7a3f@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <925d17560701030655ia74c764x43fa0448381c7a3f@mail.gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.0 OpenPGP: id=21E90840 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig67BB000E93F999B35B22CB18" X-Spam-Score: -2.6 X-Spam-Score-Int: -25 X-Spam-Bar: -- X-archive-position: 13470 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: timonator@perpetuum-immobile.de Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig67BB000E93F999B35B22CB18 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Jorge Llamb=EDas wrote: > On 1/3/07, Seth Gordon wrote: > I wonder whether the two {na}'s in {ko na ke'u na daspo le ckule} > would cancel out? What would a robot bomber do? i think two {na} refering to the same work like one (ie the second one overrides the first one) like in you have to reply ja'a go'i to a sentence containing na if you want to say "yes" to it (i might be wrong here) and maybe instead of ke'u i'd say si ;) --------------enig67BB000E93F999B35B22CB18 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFm8j6us6NTCHpCEARAsnoAJ0Q0pDK5m7HLZqwSQ5gpxXT71clhwCfelcm W0ejd46hjLR83bN2J7fLG9s= =rlEs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig67BB000E93F999B35B22CB18-- To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.