From lojban-out@lojban.org Sun Jan 07 09:11:16 2007 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 50606 invoked from network); 7 Jan 2007 17:07:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m38.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 7 Jan 2007 17:07:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail2.sea5.speakeasy.net) (69.17.117.4) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 7 Jan 2007 17:07:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 4008 invoked from network); 7 Jan 2007 17:06:41 -0000 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.66.169]) (envelope-sender ) by mail2.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP for ; 7 Jan 2007 17:06:41 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1H3bTi-0006hF-GH for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Sun, 07 Jan 2007 09:06:39 -0800 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.66.169]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1H3bTM-0006g8-Mv; Sun, 07 Jan 2007 09:06:21 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sun, 07 Jan 2007 09:05:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1H3bS5-0006fh-85 for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Sun, 07 Jan 2007 09:04:57 -0800 Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.188]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1H3bS0-0006fW-4V for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sun, 07 Jan 2007 09:04:56 -0800 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id c31so14328340nfb for ; Sun, 07 Jan 2007 09:04:49 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.182.8 with SMTP id e8mr2094032buf.1168189489606; Sun, 07 Jan 2007 09:04:49 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.115.20 with HTTP; Sun, 7 Jan 2007 09:04:49 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <925d17560701070904g78dba657j8a8510465d3c1cc7@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 14:04:49 -0300 In-Reply-To: <3ccac5f10701070552o6995a1fetce44cc0fd724ee82@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <925d17560701060757o1c0b3914w2f28416a2858cb29@mail.gmail.com> <611088.72555.qm@web81308.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <925d17560701070458t7243c3a0n2368d08b771cd615@mail.gmail.com> <3ccac5f10701070552o6995a1fetce44cc0fd724ee82@mail.gmail.com> X-Spam-Score: -2.5 X-Spam-Score-Int: -24 X-Spam-Bar: -- X-archive-position: 13523 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias@gmail.com X-list: lojban-list X-Spam-Score: -2.5 X-Spam-Score-Int: -24 X-Spam-Bar: -- X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "chain.digitalkingdom.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On 1/7/07, Cyril Slobin wrote: > > I opine that "being an unrealized event" is event about event: {lo nu > broda be lo nu brode}, where {lo nu brode} is event > promised/requested/ordered and {lo nu broda} is the state of its > unrealizedness. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.5 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY Informational: message has unparseable relay lines -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list To: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-Originating-IP: 69.17.117.4 X-eGroups-Msg-Info: 1:0:0:0 X-eGroups-From: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?=" From: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?=" Reply-To: jjllambias@gmail.com Subject: [lojban] Re: Duty, promice etc... X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790; y=MCj3tJ12OEDBsHObwlCfMn9JfBRJvQaJa-dKPuppSIyHFZY7AA X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 27962 On 1/7/07, Cyril Slobin wrote: > > I opine that "being an unrealized event" is event about event: {lo nu > broda be lo nu brode}, where {lo nu brode} is event > promised/requested/ordered and {lo nu broda} is the state of its > unrealizedness. Yes. The promise istself is an unrealized event. The state of something being a promise, or the event of making a promise, are real events. > The good example of such {lo nu broda} is {lo nu > bilga}. In fact {lo nu bilga} is a very general kind of unrealizedness > (like "nu" is very general kind of event) - whether you have promise, > request or order, you are in some or other way obliged to do so. I > opine the event of promising, requesting and commanding ( {lo nu > nupre}, {lo nu cpedu} and {lo nu minde}) are good for x3 of {bilga}. I agree: mi bilga lo nu gasnu lo se nupre kei lo nu ba'o nupre lo se nupre "I am obliged to carry out a promise by having made a promise." The x2 of bilga, my obligation, is the unrealized event of bringing about the promise. The x3 of bilga, the source of my obligation, is the realized event of having made the promise. > So, "I am bound by a promise" is {mi bilga lo nu mi brode lo nu mi > nupre}. Yes. Here "a promise" is metonymy for "having made a promise". I am bound to carry out my promise, by having made that promise. > Because it is (or should be) a very common pattern, I suggest > a series of lujvo in form {nupybilga} whith following place stucture: > x1 = nupre1 = bilga1 "who is promised and therefore obliged", x2 = > nupre2 = bilga2 "what is promiced and therefore obliged"; bilga3 = > {le nu nupre} and omitteded from lujvo place structure, x3 = nupre3 > "beneficiary/victim of a promise". How would that differ from plain {nupre}? mu'o mi'e xorxes To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.