From lojban-out@lojban.org Wed Jan 03 07:03:24 2007 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 5800 invoked from network); 3 Jan 2007 14:59:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.67.35) by m31.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 3 Jan 2007 14:59:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail1.sea5.speakeasy.net) (69.17.117.3) by mta9.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 3 Jan 2007 14:59:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 26647 invoked from network); 3 Jan 2007 14:59:44 -0000 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.66.169]) (envelope-sender ) by mail1.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP for ; 3 Jan 2007 14:59:43 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1H27ab-0000LQ-2h for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Wed, 03 Jan 2007 06:59:40 -0800 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.66.169]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1H27Yi-0000Eh-3Z; Wed, 03 Jan 2007 06:58:00 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 03 Jan 2007 06:55:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1H27WL-0000Do-EE for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Wed, 03 Jan 2007 06:55:13 -0800 Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.190]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1H27WD-0000D1-2W for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 03 Jan 2007 06:55:10 -0800 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id c31so11837266nfb for ; Wed, 03 Jan 2007 06:55:03 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.152.16 with SMTP id z16mr1694352bud.1167836103490; Wed, 03 Jan 2007 06:55:03 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.115.20 with HTTP; Wed, 3 Jan 2007 06:55:03 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <925d17560701030655ia74c764x43fa0448381c7a3f@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 11:55:03 -0300 In-Reply-To: <459BC0B2.3090803@ropine.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <000c01c72ee9$d72544b0$6601a8c0@hq.squarei.net> <459BC0B2.3090803@ropine.com> X-Spam-Score: -2.5 X-Spam-Score-Int: -24 X-Spam-Bar: -- X-archive-position: 13468 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias@gmail.com X-list: lojban-list X-Spam-Score: -2.5 X-Spam-Score-Int: -24 X-Spam-Bar: -- X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "chain.digitalkingdom.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On 1/3/07, Seth Gordon wrote: > M@ wrote: > > > Of course, there can still be misunderstandings, if there is > > interference and the word 'na' doesn't come through out of "ko na daspo > > le ckule" bad things would probably happen. > > Isn't there a standard to always use "NOT REPEAT NOT" in military > telegrams to make sure the reader doesn't skip over the word? [...] Content analysis details: (-2.5 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY Informational: message has unparseable relay lines -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list To: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-Originating-IP: 69.17.117.3 X-eGroups-Msg-Info: 1:0:0:0 X-eGroups-From: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?=" From: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?=" Reply-To: jjllambias@gmail.com Subject: [lojban] Re: Military language X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790; y=mMc6ordOGUAYmDWxi8tGcSSqi8Ks8G4F2PRh0_acmvCMdyfmJA X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 27909 On 1/3/07, Seth Gordon wrote: > M@ wrote: > > > Of course, there can still be misunderstandings, if there is > > interference and the word 'na' doesn't come through out of "ko na daspo > > le ckule" bad things would probably happen. > > Isn't there a standard to always use "NOT REPEAT NOT" in military > telegrams to make sure the reader doesn't skip over the word? Hmm... I wonder whether the two {na}'s in {ko na ke'u na daspo le ckule} would cancel out? What would a robot bomber do? mu'o mi'e xorxes To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.