From lojban-out@lojban.org Wed Jan 03 11:22:21 2007 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 96039 invoked from network); 3 Jan 2007 19:16:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m41.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 3 Jan 2007 19:16:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail3.sea5.speakeasy.net) (69.17.117.5) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 3 Jan 2007 19:16:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 21528 invoked from network); 3 Jan 2007 19:11:02 -0000 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.66.169]) (envelope-sender ) by mail3.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP for ; 3 Jan 2007 19:11:01 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1H2BVr-0007ze-3n for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Wed, 03 Jan 2007 11:10:59 -0800 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.66.169]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1H2BVN-0007vN-1d; Wed, 03 Jan 2007 11:10:36 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 03 Jan 2007 11:09:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1H2BTp-0007uZ-Oc for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Wed, 03 Jan 2007 11:08:54 -0800 Received: from silene.metacarta.com ([65.77.47.18]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1H2BTj-0007uF-DZ for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 03 Jan 2007 11:08:53 -0800 Received: from localhost (silene.metacarta.com [65.77.47.18]) by silene.metacarta.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 174B914C814F for ; Wed, 3 Jan 2007 14:08:45 -0500 (EST) Received: from silene.metacarta.com ([65.77.47.18]) by localhost (silene.metacarta.com [65.77.47.18]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 08884-01 for ; Wed, 3 Jan 2007 14:08:43 -0500 (EST) Received: from [65.77.47.178] (cheyenne.metacarta.com [65.77.47.178]) by silene.metacarta.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBFBA14C8180 for ; Wed, 3 Jan 2007 14:08:33 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <459BFF31.90807@ropine.com> Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2007 14:08:33 -0500 User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20060926) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <000c01c72ee9$d72544b0$6601a8c0@hq.squarei.net> <459BC0B2.3090803@ropine.com> <459BCE6B.8040603@perpetuum-immobile.de> In-Reply-To: <459BCE6B.8040603@perpetuum-immobile.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at metacarta.com X-Spam-Score: -2.6 X-Spam-Score-Int: -25 X-Spam-Bar: -- X-archive-position: 13476 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: sethg@ropine.com X-list: lojban-list X-Spam-Score: -2.6 X-Spam-Score-Int: -25 X-Spam-Bar: -- X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "chain.digitalkingdom.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Timo Paulssen wrote: > Seth Gordon wrote: > >>Isn't there a standard to always use "NOT REPEAT NOT" in military >>telegrams to make sure the reader doesn't skip over the word? > > > another thought that just came to my mind is that lojban allows the > vowels to be spoken as long as the user desires to, so maybe i'd just > say "naaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa" instead of "na" :) [...] Content analysis details: (-2.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY Informational: message has unparseable relay lines -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] -0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list To: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-Originating-IP: 69.17.117.5 X-eGroups-Msg-Info: 1:0:0:0 X-eGroups-From: Seth Gordon From: Seth Gordon Reply-To: sethg@ropine.com Subject: [lojban] Re: Military language X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790; y=9qQHSmu6SD6z43-ioRAv5rnnO_YcyBAYJCF5M2OL9qGKtOQvpA X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 27916 Timo Paulssen wrote: > Seth Gordon wrote: > >>Isn't there a standard to always use "NOT REPEAT NOT" in military >>telegrams to make sure the reader doesn't skip over the word? > > > another thought that just came to my mind is that lojban allows the > vowels to be spoken as long as the user desires to, so maybe i'd just > say "naaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa" instead of "na" :) Cf. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MKX0RN19zc0 > To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.