From lojban-out@lojban.org Tue Jan 09 09:20:04 2007 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 14726 invoked from network); 9 Jan 2007 17:19:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.67.35) by m38.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 9 Jan 2007 17:19:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail5.sea5.speakeasy.net) (69.17.117.7) by mta9.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 9 Jan 2007 17:19:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 1231 invoked from network); 9 Jan 2007 17:17:20 -0000 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.66.169]) (envelope-sender ) by mail5.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP for ; 9 Jan 2007 17:17:19 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1H4Kb7-00011T-HG for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 09:17:17 -0800 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.66.169]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1H4Kad-0000xR-Fr; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 09:16:53 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 09 Jan 2007 09:15:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1H4KYf-0000vV-97 for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 09:14:48 -0800 Received: from phma.optus.nu ([166.82.175.165] helo=ixazon.dynip.com) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1H4KYO-0000tw-Pt for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 09:14:43 -0800 Received: from chausie (unknown [192.168.7.4]) by ixazon.dynip.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8992CE8F4 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 12:14:08 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 12:12:48 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <45A32064.4070604@pcisys.net> In-Reply-To: <45A32064.4070604@pcisys.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200701091212.49131.phma@phma.optus.nu> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 X-Spam-Score-Int: -22 X-Spam-Bar: -- X-archive-position: 13529 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: phma@phma.optus.nu X-list: lojban-list X-Spam-Score: -2.2 X-Spam-Score-Int: -21 X-Spam-Bar: -- X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "chain.digitalkingdom.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On Monday 08 January 2007 23:56, Stephen David Simmons wrote: > I also use "binjinpoi" for the "transition metals", as they are between > the alkali/alkalines and the non-metal/metalloids/near metals; and > "cnobinjinpoi" for the actinides/lanthanides, as they are part of the > period that adds electrons in deeply buried subshells; and "jbijinpoi" > for poor-metals or near-metals such as tin and aluminum (this class is > somewhat artificial, and the English language group has already > recognized "poor" as a bad distinguishing characteristic); and > "si'irjinpoi" for the coinage metals (copper, silver, and gold); and > ninpoi for the noble gases. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.2 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO Received: contains a forged HELO 0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY Informational: message has unparseable relay lines -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.2 DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE RBL: Envelope sender in abuse.rfc-ignorant.org 0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list To: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-Originating-IP: 69.17.117.7 X-eGroups-Msg-Info: 1:0:0:0 X-eGroups-From: Pierre Abbat From: Pierre Abbat Reply-To: phma@phma.optus.nu Subject: [lojban] Re: kliru, sodna, navni, etc. X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790; y=brYQAE-cPtd2B75v8-dnbjbF8neteVf9oGwcUJQ3CIFPugeqnw X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 27969 On Monday 08 January 2007 23:56, Stephen David Simmons wrote: > I also use "binjinpoi" for the "transition metals", as they are between > the alkali/alkalines and the non-metal/metalloids/near metals; and > "cnobinjinpoi" for the actinides/lanthanides, as they are part of the > period that adds electrons in deeply buried subshells; and "jbijinpoi" > for poor-metals or near-metals such as tin and aluminum (this class is > somewhat artificial, and the English language group has already > recognized "poor" as a bad distinguishing characteristic); and > "si'irjinpoi" for the coinage metals (copper, silver, and gold); and > ninpoi for the noble gases. rafsi nitpick: "jin" (djine, ring) should be "jim". I noticed you wrote "blajinme" for "xinjinme". Looking at the explanation of the name on Wikipedia, "blajinme" is correct. Pierre To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.