From lojban-out@lojban.org Fri Jan 05 00:25:21 2007 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 66899 invoked from network); 5 Jan 2007 08:18:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.172) by m11.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 5 Jan 2007 08:18:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail2.sea5.speakeasy.net) (69.17.117.4) by mta4.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 5 Jan 2007 08:18:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 13509 invoked from network); 5 Jan 2007 08:16:03 -0000 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.66.169]) (envelope-sender ) by mail2.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP for ; 5 Jan 2007 08:16:02 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1H2kEw-0000uZ-HU for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Fri, 05 Jan 2007 00:15:55 -0800 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.66.169]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1H2kEG-0000ld-97; Fri, 05 Jan 2007 00:15:14 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 05 Jan 2007 00:11:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1H2k9k-0000lB-TU for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Fri, 05 Jan 2007 00:10:31 -0800 Received: from bay0-omc1-s35.bay0.hotmail.com ([65.54.246.107]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1H2k9T-0000ke-E6 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 05 Jan 2007 00:10:22 -0800 Received: from BAY114-W5 ([65.54.169.105]) by bay0-omc1-s35.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2668); Fri, 5 Jan 2007 00:10:05 -0800 X-Originating-Email: [fen141@msn.com] Message-ID: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_68d4450a-1f68-466b-bfbe-c84edbe6d78e_" Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 08:10:05 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Jan 2007 08:10:05.0122 (UTC) FILETIME=[E8288A20:01C730A0] X-Spam-Score: 2.9 X-Spam-Score-Int: 29 X-Spam-Bar: ++ X-archive-position: 13486 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: fen141@msn.com X-list: lojban-list X-Spam-Score: 2.9 X-Spam-Score-Int: 29 X-Spam-Bar: ++ X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "chain.digitalkingdom.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: ua nai ru'e I'm working on a small-scale consulting project and rethinking the language. Chances are, he won't look at the code. However, I'll probably comment in English. I'm tempted to toss in some Lojban somewhere. If I used my own language, the constructs would have to be mostly english (if, for, while). All internal documentation could still be Lojban (master semantic details). [...] Content analysis details: (2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 2.3 FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD Forged hotmail.com 'Received:' header found 0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY Informational: message has unparseable relay lines -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 1.4 HTML_10_20 BODY: Message is 10% to 20% HTML 0.2 DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE RBL: Envelope sender in abuse.rfc-ignorant.org 1.7 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST RBL: Envelope sender in postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org -0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list To: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-Originating-IP: 69.17.117.4 X-eGroups-Msg-Info: 1:0:0:0 X-eGroups-From: Fen Fen From: Fen Fen Reply-To: fen141@msn.com Subject: [lojban] Lojban and le gunka X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790; y=qROv5nGc49L4W4VDXDv-pM7A2pl6U9LR8EZ7QNVRGaxhc_g1_Q X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 27926 --_68d4450a-1f68-466b-bfbe-c84edbe6d78e_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable ua nai ru'e I'm working on a small-scale consulting project and rethinking = the language. Chances are, he won't look at the code. However, I'll probabl= y comment in English. I'm tempted to toss in some Lojban somewhere. If I us= ed my own language, the constructs would have to be mostly english (if, for= , while). All internal documentation could still be Lojban (master semantic= details). =20 Anybody try to use Lojban for professional stuff? An old boss of mine named= computers after gismu, I think. You could certainly start a nuzba.com or s= omething, given the goofy names of huge internet companies. --_68d4450a-1f68-466b-bfbe-c84edbe6d78e_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable ua nai ru'e I'm working on a small-scale consulting project and rethi= nking the language. Chances are, he won't look at the code. However, I'll p= robably comment in English. I'm tempted to toss in some Lojban somewhere. I= f I used my own language, the constructs would have to be mostly english (i= f, for, while). All internal documentation could still be Lojban (master se= mantic details).
 
Anybody try to use Lojban for professional stuff? An old boss of mine named= computers after gismu, I think. You could certainly start a nuzba.com or s= omething, given the goofy names of huge internet companies.
--_68d4450a-1f68-466b-bfbe-c84edbe6d78e_--